XML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 19 , No. 2
[Paper List] [Go to Volume List]

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 215-231
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 31 May 2006
Received 13 Oct 2005 Revised 06 Feb 2006

Technology Adoption and Wage Distribution in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector: Quantile Regression Analysis
Inchul Kim ; Insik Min
Research Fellow, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, Seoul, Korea (ikim@kiet.re.kr)
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Kyung Hee University, Hoegi-dong 1, Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul 130-701, Korea (ROK), Tel: +82-2-961-0966, Fax: +82-2-966-7426 (imin@khu.ac.kr)

Funding Information ▼

JEL Classfication: C13, E24, J31, O33

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of technology adoption on the wage dispersion in the U.S. manufacturing sector using the quantile regression method. We obtain two main results. First, during the period of 1970 to 1995, the marginal effect of capital intensity on wage has risen. Second, the marginal effect on high-wage quantiles has risen more than that on low-wage quantiles. These results suggest that (1) high-wage quantile have adopted technologies more actively than others, and (2) high-captial intensity industries have contributed to the widening of wage dispersion over the period.

Keywords: Technology adoption, Wage dispersion, Quantile regression
Acknowledgments

respectively. Insik Min's research was supported by the Kyung Hee University Research Fund in 2004 (KHU-20040335). We wish to thank anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. Any remaining errors are our own.

References
1. Acemoglu, D. “Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (No. 4 1998): 1055-89.
2. Acemoglu, D. Directed Technical Change. NBER Working Paper No. 8287, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001a.
3. Acemoglu, D. Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market. Manuscript, M.I.T., 2001b.
4. Aghion, P., and Bolton, P. “A Theory of Trickle-Down Growth and Development.” Review of Economic Studies 64 (No. 2 1997): 151-72.
5. Allen, S. “Updated Notes on the Interindustry Wage Structure, 1890-1990.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48 (No. 2 1995): 305-21.
6. Bartelsman, E., and Gray, W. The NBER Manufacturing Productivity Database. National Bureau of Economic Research Technical Paper No. 205, 1996.
7. Buchinsky, M. “Changes in the U.S. Wage Structure 1963-1987: Application of Quantile Regression.” Econometrica 62 (No. 2 1994): 405-58.
8. Caselli, F. “Technological Revolutions.” American Economic Review 89 (No. 1 1999): 78-102.
9. Dunne, T., Haltiwanger, J., and Troske, K. “Technology and Jobs, Secular Changes and Cyclical Dynamics.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 46 (1997): 107-78.
10. Goldin, C., and Katz, L. “The Origins of Technology-Skill Complementarity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (No. 3 1998): 693-732.
11. Gonzales, X. and Miles, D. “Wage Inequality in a Developing Country, Decrease in Minimum Wage or Increase in Education Returns.” Empirical Economics 26 (No. 1 2001): 135-48.
12. Hulten, C. “Technical Change and Reproducibility of Capital.” American Economic Review 65 (No. 5 1975): 956-65.
13. Kim, I. Technology Adoption, Wage Inequality and Economic Growth. Manuscript, Texas A&M University, 2002.
14. Koenker, R. “Confidence Intervals for Regression Quantiles.” in P. Mandl and M. Huskova (eds.) Asymptotic Statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
15. Koenker, R., and Bassett, G.　“Regression Quantiles.” Econometrica 46 (No. 1 1978): 33-50.
16. Lemieux, T. Residual Wage Inequality: Composition Effects, Noisy Data, or Rising Demand for Skill. Working Paper, University of British Columbia, 2004.
17. Oja, H. “On Location, Scale, Skewness and Kurtosis of Univariate Distribution.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 8 (No. 2 1981): 154-68.
18. Pizer, S. “Does International Competition Undermine Wage Differentials and Increase Inequality?” Journal of International Economics 52 (No. 2 2000): 259-82.
19. Ruppert, D. “What is Kurtosis? An Influence Function Approach.” The American Statistician 41 (No. 1 1987): 1-5.
 

Editorial Office, Seoul Journal of Economics, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University 599 Gwanangno, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-746, Korea
Tel: +82-2-880-5434 | Fax: +82-2-888-4454 | E-mail: sje@plaza.snu.ac.kr
Copyright (c) 2020 SJE. All rights reserved.