Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 17 , No. 3

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 17, No. 3, pp.309-334
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Aug 2004
Received 04 Nov 2004 Revised 08 Nov 2004

Capital Mobility, Financial Risk, Institutions and Redistributive Spending
Junkyu Lee ; Jeffrey B. Nugent
Director of the Americas Team in Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP), 300-4, Yomgok-Dong, Seocho-Gu, Seoul 137-747, Korea, Tel: +82-2-3460-1128 (junkyul@kiep.go.kr)
Professor of Economics, USC Department of Economics, University Park Campus, Univetsity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0253, USA, Tel: +1-213-740-2107 (nugent@rcf.usc.edu)

JEL Classification: H1, O4


As democracy spreads, the importance of redistribution policies is believed to increase, bringing with them the threat of weakening incentives and slowing growth. Yet, to date the determinants of redistribution policies have rarely been investigated outside a few OECD countries and outside the context of narrowly defined transfer payments. This paper examines the determinants of a broader class of redistribution policies, namely, the share of public spending on health, education and welfare in total government spending in a larger set of countries (a panel data set consisting of 105 countries) over the period 1988-2000. In particular, the paper views redistributive spending as emanating from two global trends: deregulation of international capital movements and the spread of democratic institutions. Our basic hypothesis is that because of the risks involved in international capital mobility and the fact that their use of standard macroeconomic policies is increasingly limited by international rules of the game, governments find redistributive spending policies convenient tools for dealing with the distributive effects inherent in these risks, especially when financial crises actually occur. The results, with both fixed and random effects models, support most of the hypotheses, several of them quite strongly.

Keywords: Growth, Crisis, Redistribution, Capital Mobility, Reform


Paper to be presented at the 12th Seoul Journal of Economics International Symposium in Seoul on November 4, 2004.

1. Alesina, Alberto, and Dani, Rodrik. “Distributive Politics and Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (No. 2 1994): 465-90.
2. Baldacci, Emanuele, Luiz, Mello, and Gabriela, Inchauste. Financial Crises, Poverty, and Income Distribution. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Paper, 2004.
3. Barro, Robert. “Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries.” Journal of Economic Growth 5 (No. 1 2000): 5-32.
4. Benabou. R. “Inequality and Growth.” In NBER Macroeconomic Annual. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 1-74, 1996.
5. Bishop, John, Formby, John, and Smith, W. James. “Incomplete Information, Income Distribution and Risk Averse Median Voter Behavior.” Public Choice 68 (Nos. 1-2 1991): 41-55.
6. Chinn, Dennis, and Ito, Hiro. Capital Account Liberalization, Institutions and Financial Development: Cross Country Evidence. USC Development Seminar, 2002.
7. Dailami, Mansoor. Financial Openness, Democracy, and Redistributive Policy. World Bank Working Paper, 2000.
8. Edwards, Sebastian. Capital Mobility and Economic Performance: Are Emerging Economies Different? NBER Working Paper No. 8076, 2000.
9. Fratzscher, Marchel, and Matthieu, Bussiere. Financial Openness and Growth: Short-Run Gain, Long-Run Gain. European Central Bank, Working Paper, 2004.
10. Freedom House. Freedom in the World Country Ratings 1972 through 2003. 2004.
11. Hausman, Jerry A. “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrics 46 (No. 6 1978): 1251-71.
12. International Monetary Fund, Government Finance Statistics Yearbook. Washington, D.C.; IMF, Various Years.
13. Kaminsky, Graciela, and Carmen, Reinhart. “The Twin Crises: the Causes of Banking and Balance of Payments Problem.” American Economic Review 89 (No. 3 1999): 473-500.
14. Levine, Loss, and Zervos, Sara. “Capital Control Liberalization and Stock Market Development.” World Development 26 (August 1998): 766-84.
15. Milanovic, Branko. Do More Unequal Countries Redistribute More? Does the Median Voter Hypothesis Hold? Washington, D.C.: World Bank, Working Paper, 1999.
16. Olsen, Mancur. “Why Some Welfare State Redistribution Is a Great Idea.” In Charles K. Rowley (ed.), Democracy and Public Choice: Essays in Honor of Gordon Tullock. Oxford. Blackwell, pp. 191-222, 1987.
17. Persson, Thorsten, and Guido, Tabellini. “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?” American Economic Review 84 (No. 3 1994): 600 -21.
18. Prasad, E., Rogoff, Kenneth, Shang-Jin, Wei, and Kose, M. A. Effects of Financial Globalization on Developing Countries: Some Empirical Evidence. Washington, D.C.: IMF, 2003.
19. Quinn, Dennis, and Wooley, John. Democracy and International Financial Liberalization. American Political Science Association Conference, 2000.
20. Quinn, Dennis, and Wooley, John. “Democracy and National Economic Performance.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (No. 3 2001): 634-57.
21. Quinn, Dennis, and Wooley, John, and Inclan, Carla. How and Where Capital Account Liberalization Leads to Economic Growth. American Political Science Association Conference Paper, 2001.
22. Rodrik, Dani. “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments.” Journal of Political Economy 106 (No. 5 1998): 997-1032.
23. Sen, Amartya K. Global Justice: Beyond International Equity. New York, London: Oxford University Press, 1999.
24. Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Bhattacharya, Amar.  Underpinnings for a Stable and Equitable Global Financial System from Old Debates to a New Paradigm. Paper Prepared for the Eleventh Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, April 28-30, Washington, D.C.: 1999.
25. Strauss, John, Kathleen, Beegle, Agus, Dwiyanto, Yulia, Herawati, Daan, Pattinasarany, Satriawan, Bondan, Sikoki, Sukamdi, and Firman, Witoelar. Indonesian Living Standards Before and after the Financial Crisis. Santa Monica: Rand and Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2004.
26. Wessel, J. H. “Redistribution from a Constitutional Perspective.” Constitutional Political Economy 4 (No. 3 1993): 425-48.
27. World Bank. World Development Indicators 2003. 2003.