You are not permitted to access the full text of articles.
If you have any questions about permissions,
please contact the Society.
ํ์๋์ ๋ ผ๋ฌธ ์ด์ฉ ๊ถํ์ด ์์ต๋๋ค.
๊ถํ ๊ด๋ จ ๋ฌธ์๋ ํํ๋ก ๋ถํ ๋๋ฆฝ๋๋ค.
|[ Article ]|
|Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 59-69|
|ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)|
|Print publication date 28 Feb 2003|
|Received 09 Jun 2003 Revised 15 Dec 2003|
|Comparative Statics on the Left-Side Relatively Weak First-Degree Stochastic Dominance Order and Its Applications|
Suyeol Ryu ; Iltae Kim
|Research Fellow, Busan Development Institute, Busan, Republic of Korea, Tel: +82-51-640-2025 (email@example.com)|
|Professor, Department of Economics and Management Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Republic of Korea, Tel: +82-62-530-1550 (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
JEL Classification: D81
This paper proposes a new concept of the left-side relatively weak first-degree stochastic dominance (L-RWFSD) order that extends the monotone likelihood ratio (MLR) order and the left-side monotone likelihood ratio (L-MLR) order. We show that this shift is a larger subset of FSD shifts than the MLR shift and the L-MLR shift that derive the same comparative statics results.
|Keywords: Left-side relatively weak first-degree stochastic dominance, Monotone likelihood ratio order, Left-side monotone likelihood ratio order
The authors would like to thank anonymous referees for insightful comments.
|1.||Dionne, G., Eeckhoudt, L., and Gollier, C. “Increases in Risk and Linear Payoffs.” International Economic Review 34 (No. 2 1993a): 309-19.
|2.||Dionne, G., Eeckhoudt, L., and Gollier, C. “Relatively Weak Increases in Risk and Their Comparative Statics.” Economics Letters 41 (No. 3 1993b): 269-72.
|3.||Eeckhoudt, L., and Gollier, C. “Demand for Risky Assets and the Monotone Probability Ratio Order.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 11 (No. 1 1995): 113-22.
|4.||Feder, G. “The Impact of Uncertainty in a Class of Objective Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 16 (No. 2 1977): 504-12.
|5.||Fishburn, P. C., and Porter, B. “Optimal Portfolio with One Safe and One Risky Asset: Effects of Changes in Rate of Return and Risk.” Management Science 22 (1976): 1064-73.
|6.||Katz, E. “A Note on a Comparative Statics Theorem for Choice under Risk.” Journal of Economic Theory 25 (No. 2 1981): 318-9.
|7.||Kim, S. Changing Distributions in the Strong Sense and Their Comparative Statics: A Ratio Approach. Dissertation, Michigan State University, 1998.|
|8.||Kraus, M. “A Comparative Statics Theorem for Choice under Risk.” Journal of Economic Theory 21 (No. 3 1979): 510-17.
|9.||Landsberger, M., and Meilijson, I. “Demand for Risky Financial Assets: A Portfolio Analysis.” Journal of Economic Theory 50 (No. 1 1990): 204-13.
|10.||Paroush, J., and Kahana, N. “Price Uncertainty and the Cooperative Firm.” American Economic Review 70 (No. 1 1980): 212-6.|
|11.||Rothschild, M., and Stiglitz, J. “Increasing Risk: II. Its Economic Consequences.” Journal of Economic Theory 3 (No. 1 1971): 66-84.
|12.||Sandmo, A. “On the Theory of the Competitive Firm under Price Uncertainty.” American Economic Review 61 (No. 1 1971): 65-73.|
|13.||Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 2nd Ed. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1944.|
Editorial Office, Seoul Journal of Economics, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University 599 Gwanangno, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-746, Korea
Tel: +82-2-880-5434 | Fax: +82-2-888-4454 | E-mail: email@example.com
Copyright (c) 2020 SJE. All rights reserved.