XML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 30 , No. 2

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 189-219
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 30 May 2017
Received 17 Dec 2014 Revised 31 Jan 2017 Accepted 05 Apr 2017

Specific Features of the Velocity of Money for Euro and Non-Euro Countries across the Euro Entry
Koo Woong Park
Koo Woong Park, Associate Professor, Division of International Trade, Incheon National University, 119, Academy-Ro, Yeonsu-Gu, Incheon, Korea, Tel: 82-32-835-8546, Fax: 82-32-835-0786 (kwpark@inu.ac.kr)

Funding Information ▼

JEL Classification: E31, E41, E51


Abstract

Eleven European countries adopted the Euro as their single national currency in 1999, and others have followed suit to form a 19-member single-currency bloc by 2015. Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain were the founding members. In the ordinary least squares (OLS)/panel regressions for 1992–2011 for seven Euro and four non-Euro countries, the GDP growth rate has a strong positive effect on the money velocity change rate, whereas the money growth rate exhibits a strong negative effect. Generally, deposit rates have strong positive effects and lending rates present negative effects for the seven Euro countries. In the regressions for the pre-Euro (1993–1997) and post-Euro (2003–2007) subperiods, we identify a shift in the importance of responsiveness of velocity change rate from money growth rates to inflation, deposit, and lending rates, although the impact of the former remains dominant. In the third nonlinear smooth transition regression (STR) models for the United Kingdom for 1980–2015 and the Netherlands for 1982–2015, we identify a much better fit than the aforementioned linear OLS models. We could also specify endogenously the structural break points in the behavior of money velocity against price level using STR models.


Keywords: Euro, Structural change, Smooth transition regression, Money demand, Velocity of money

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Professors Chung-ki Min, Jae-Young Kim, In Choi, and two anonymous referees for their invaluable comments. All the remaining errors are mine. This work was supported by the Incheon National University Research Grant in 2015.


References
1. Assenmacher-Wesche, Katrin, and Stefan Gerlach. “Money at Low Frequencies.” Journal of the European Economic Association 5 (Nos. 2-3 2007): 534-42.
2. Bank of England. Three Centuries of Macroeconomic Data. Retrieved on 11 January 2017, Available at http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/Pages/home.aspx.
3. Baltagi, Badi H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 4th ed., Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
4. Bordo, Michael D., Lars Jonung, and Pierre L. Siklos, “Institutional Change and the Velocity of Money: A Century of Evidence.” Economic Enquiry 35 (No. 4 1997): 710-24.
5. Carlson, John B., Dennis L. Hoffman, Benjamin D. Keen, and Robert H. Rasche. “Results of a Study of the Stability of Cointegrating Relations Comprised of Broad Monetary Aggregates.” Journal of Monetary Economics 46 (No. 2 2000): 345-83.
6. Carstensen, Kai. “Stock Market Downswing and the Stability of European Monetary Union Money Demand.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 24 (No. 4 2006): 395-402.
7. Choi, In, and Pentti Saikkonen. “Testing Linearity in Cointegrating Smooth Transition Regressions.” Econometrics Journal 7 (No. 2 2004): 341-65.
8. Cramer, J. S. “Velocity of Circulation.” In John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave A Dictionary of Economics. U.K.: The Macmillan Press Limited, pp. 801-2, 1987.
9. Danthine, Jean-Pierre. “Financial Development: Can We Have too Much of A Good Thing?” Speech at the International Conference on ‘Financial Development, Stability and Growth.’ jointly organised by the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) and the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, pp. 1-6, 25 October 2012.
10. De Nederlandsche Bank. Table 5.4., Contribution of the Netherlands to Euro Area Monetary Aggregates (Stocks), M3 including Currency in Circulation. Retrieved on 22 January 2017, Available at http://www.dnb.nl/en/home/index.jsp.
11. Dougherty, Christopher. Introduction to Econometrics. 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
12. Ericsson, Neil R., David F. Hendry, and Kevin M. Prestwich. “The Demand for Broad Money in the United Kingdom, 1878-1993.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 100 (No. 1 1998): 289-324.
13. European Central Bank. Retrieved on 28 October 2014, Available at https://www.ecb.europa.eu/euro/intro/html/index.en.html.
14. Friedman, Milton. “The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement.” In Friedman, Milton (ed.), Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3-21, 1956.
15. Friedman, Milton. “Monetary Variability: United States and Japan: Note.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 15 (No. 3 1983): 339-43.
16. Friedman, Milton. “Lessons from the 1979-1982 Monetary Policy Experiment.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 74 (No. 2 1984): 397-400.
17. Friedman, Milton, and Anna J. Schwartz. Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
18. Friedman, Milton, and Anna J. Schwartz. “Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Economic Data.” American Economic Review 81 (No. 1 1991): 39-49.
19. Greene, William H. Econometric Analysis, 6th ed., New Jersey: Pearson-Prentice Hall, 2008.
20. Hendry, David F., and Neil R. Ericsson. “An Econometric Analysis of U.K. Money Demand in Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom by Milton Friedman and Anna J. Schwartz.” American Economic Review 81 (No. 1 1991): 8-38.
21. International Monetary Fund. International Financial Statistics, various issues.
22. Johansen, S. “Statistical Analysis of Cointegrating Vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12 (Nos. 2-3 1988): 231-54.
23. Johansen, S. “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegrating Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregression Models.” Econometrica 59 (No. 6 1991): 1551-80.
24. Kang, Heejoon. “Unstable Multiple Cointegration Relations in the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Seoul Journal of Economics 15 (No. 1 2002): 31-54.
25. Keynes, J. Maynard. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, London: Macmillan St. Martin’ Press, 1936.
26. Kim, Woocheol. “Nonparametric Kernel Estimation of Evolutionary Autoregressive Processes.” Seoul Journal of Economics 25 (No. 4 2012): 463-88.
27. Mayhew, N. J. “Population, Money Supply, and the Velocity of Circulation in England, 1300-1700.” Economic History Review XLVIII (No. 2 1995): 238-57.
28. Mishkin, Frederic S. The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. 5th ed., Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1998.
29. Mishkin, Frederic S. The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. 11th ed., Harlow, Essex: Pearson, 2016.
30. Muscatelli, Vito Antonio, and Franco Spinelli. “An Econometric and Historical Perspective on the Long-run Stability of the Demand for Money: The Case of Italy.” Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 56 (Nos. 1-2 1997): 41-65.
31. Norges-Bank. Norwegian Central Bank. Available at http://norgesbank.no/en/Statistics/.
32. Oesterreichische Nationalbank. Available at http://www.oenb.at/en/.
33. Phillips, Peter C. B., and B. E. Hansen. “Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) Processes.” Review of Economic Studies 57 (No. 1 1990): 99-125.
34. Riksbank. Swedish Central Bank. Available at http://www.riksbank.se/en/Statistics/.
35. Saikkonen, Pentti, and In Choi. “Cointegrating Smooth Transition Regressions.” Econometric Theory 20 (No. 2 2004): 301-40.
36. Teräsvirta, Timo, and Ann-Charlotte Eliasson. “Non-Linear Error Correction and the UK Demand for Broad Money, 1878-1993.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 16 (No. 3 2001): 277-88.
37. Van Dijk, Dick, Timo Teräsvirta, and Philip Hans Franses. “Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models – A Survey of Recent Developments.” Econometric Reviews 21 (No. 1 2002): 1-47.