You are not permitted to access the full text of articles.
If you have any questions about permissions,
please contact the Society.
νμλμ λ Όλ¬Έ μ΄μ© κΆνμ΄ μμ΅λλ€.
κΆν κ΄λ ¨ λ¬Έμλ ννλ‘ λΆν λλ¦½λλ€.
|[ Article ]|
|Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 29, No. 4, pp.439-456|
|ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)|
|Print publication date 30 Nov 2016|
|Received 21 Jul 2016 Revised 26 Sep 2016 Accepted 11 Oct 2016|
|From a Disaster to a Miracle: Suggestions for North Korea|
Jisoon Lee ; Byungwook Lee
|Jisoon Lee, Professor Emeritus, Department of Economics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea, Tel: +82-2-880-6383 (email@example.com)|
|Byungwook Lee, Corresponding author, Research Assistant Professor, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea, Tel: +82-2-880-6395 (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
JEL Classification: O10, P50
Utilizing a model of income and population growth specialized to a dual-class (master-slave) economy, we show that the lack of ownership for the majority of people may have been the main culprit why North Korea has remained stagnant in the past. The slave-workers, for whom ownership (and freedom) is denied, end up with a subsistent level of income. However, the masters, who own not only property but also slaves, end up with a big income.
When the slave-workers are liberated to become property owning free people, their income will increase far above the subsistent level. However, the former master-owners’ income will shrink sharply. Knowing this fact, masters have strong incentives to maintain the slavery and slaves have equally strong incentives to overturn it.
If a binding commitment can be made, under which the masters free the slaves and the freed slaves give back portions of their increased income to their former masters, a smooth transition to a free economy can be engineered.
|Keywords: North Korean economy, Ownership, Escape from Malthusian trap
We are grateful to Professors Lucas, Stokey, and Hirano for their valuable comments on an earlier version. We also thank the referees for their comments, which were instrumental in revising the paper.
|1.||Bank of Korea, ECOS, An Economic Statistics Site, Available at: http://ecos.bok.or.kr (in Korean).|
|2.||Becker, Gary S., and H. Gregg Lewis. “Interaction between Quantity and Quality of Children.” In Theodore W. Schultz (ed.), The Economics of Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital. U.S.A.: University of Chicago Press, pp. 81-90, 1974.|
|3.||Breitbart (Los Angeles). “North Korean Elite Live a Life of Luxury, While Majority of Citizens Starve.” April 10, 2015.|
|4.||Chun, H. T. “The Second Economy in North Korea.” Seoul Journal of Economics 12 (No. 2 1999): 173-94.|
|5.||Economist (London). “North Korea: Rumbling from below.” February 9, 2013.|
|6.||Independent (London). “North Korea: Rich Kids of the Peoples’ Republic Savor Life in ‘Pyonghattan’.” May 15, 2016.|
|7.||Jeong, H.G. “Initial Conditions, Economic Performance, and Reform Prospects in North Korea.” Seoul Journal of Economics 26 (No. 4 2013): 433-52.|
|8.||Kim, B.Y., and Song, D. “The Participation of North Korean Households in Informal Economy: Size, Determinants, and Effect.” Seoul Journal of Economics 22 (No. 2 2008): 361-85.|
|9.||Lucas, Robert E. Jr. “Industrial Revolution: Past and Future.” Lectures on Economic Growth. U.S.A.: Harvard University Press, pp. 109-88, 2002.|
|10.||Maddison, Angus. “The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective.” Development Center Studies. Paris: OECD, 2001.
|11.||New York Times (New York). “North Korea May Take Action to Jolt Economy, Analysts Say.” September 5, 2012.|
|12.||New York Times (New York). “Pyongyang Losing Grip on Economy.” June 3, 2013.|
Editorial Office, Seoul Journal of Economics, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University 599 Gwanangno, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-746, Korea
Tel: +82-2-880-5434 | Fax: +82-2-888-4454 | E-mail: email@example.com
Copyright (c) 2020 SJE. All rights reserved.