Editorial BoardXML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 36 , No. 4

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 425-458
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Nov 2023
Received 12 Oct 2023 Revised 15 Nov 2023 Accepted 15 Nov 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22904/sje.2023.36.4.003

An empirical comparison of external indebtedness in East Asia and Southern Europe: reasons for Clearing Integrated Monetary Areas
Andrea Carrera ; Luís Cárdenas ; Alysson Mazoni
Complutense University of Madrid, Department of Applied Economics, Structure & History. Complutense Institute for International Studies (ICEI), Madrid, Spain (andcar07@ucm.es)
Complutense University of Madrid, Department of Applied Economics, Public Economics and Political Economy. Complutense Institute for International Studies (ICEI), Madrid, Spain (luiscard@ucm.es)
State University of Campinas, Department of Science and Technology Policy, Institute of Geoscience, Brazil (afmazoni@unicamp)

Funding Information ▼

JEL Classification: F33; F34; F41


Abstract

We seek to study the evolution of the external indebtedness of Southern European Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain, which were highly indebted and used to run current account deficits until the Great Crisis of 2008, and the indebtedness of those East Asian countries that ran current account deficits before the crisis of 1997, namely Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand. We pore over foreign debt and balance-of-payments data to understand any potential statistical relationship between (i) external indebtedness and (ii) current account balances plus changes in foreign exchange reserves. Our introductory econometric approach to the issue suggests that indebtedness is often and on average about twice the level attributable to current account balances and reserve changes. In Southern Europe, debt should have increased, but it increased more than expected. In East Asia, particularly since 1997, debt should have decreased, but it followed and upward trend. We attribute this phenomenon to the incomplete structure of the international payment system and, as a general solution, we call for the implementation of a regional real-time gross settlement system.


Keywords: External debt, Current account, Growth models, Comparative Political Economy, East Asia, Southern Europe

Acknowledgments

Andrea Carrera is grateful to the Complutense Institute for International Studies in Madrid, Spain, the Department of Science and Technology Policy at the University of Campinas, Brazil, and the Institute for Economic Research at Seoul National University, where this article has been developed under EU’s Marie Skłodowska-Curie CatChain project. A draft of this paper has also been presented by the same author at the 18th annual conference of the East Asian Economic Association at Seoul National University on October 21-22, 2023, from which the final version has benefited. Luís Cárdenas is grateful to “La Sapienza” University of Rome and Roma Tre University, Italy, where this paper was developed. Alysson Mazoni thanks the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) in the context of the grant 2021/05823-1. The authors thank Alvaro Cencini and two anonymous referees for useful suggestions.


References
1. Carrera, A., Cárdenas, L., and Arribas Martínez, V., Southern Europe and the Frugal Four: structural external over-indebtedness?, Social Science Research Network (No. 4441999), 2023.
2. Carrera, A., and Cencini, A., National and International Monetary Payments: National and International. From Smith to Keynes to Schmitt. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024 (forthcoming).
3. Cencini, A., and Schmitt, B., External Debt Servicing. A Vicious Circle, London and New York: Pinters Publishers, 1991.
4. Chung, D., and Eichengreen, B., “Exchange Rate Arrangements for Emerging East Asia.” in D. Chung and B. Eichengreen (eds.): Toward an East Asian Exchange Rate Regime, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2007: 1-21.
5. De Grauwe, P., The Economics of Monetary Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
6. Eichengreen, B., Globalizing capital: a history of the international monetary system, Princeton University Press, 2019.
7. Eichengreen, B., and Hausmann, R. (eds.), Other People’s Money: Debt Denomination and Financial Instability in Emerging Market Economies, University of Chicago Press, 2010.
8. Epstein, G. A. (ed.), The Political Economy of International Finance in an Age of Inequality Soft Currencies, Hard Landings, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.
9. European Central Bank, Blue Book, Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank, 2007.
10. Hale, G., and Juvenal, L., “External Balance Sheets and the COVID-19 Crisis.” Journal of Banking & Finance 147(2023).
11. International Monetary Fund, Total Reserves. International Financial Statistics and data files, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FI.RES.TOTL.CD, Retrieved on September 20, 2022.
12. International Monetary Fund, Currency Composition of Foreign Exchange Reserves, https://data.imf.org/?sk=E6A5F467-C14B-4AA8-9F6D-5A09EC4E62A4, Retrieved on May 6, 2023.
13. Fleming, J. M., Domestic financial policies under fixed and under floating exchange rates, IMF Staff Papers 9 (No.3 1962): 369–79.
14. Frieden, J. A., & Walter, S., “Understanding the political economy of the Eurozone crisis.” Annual Review of Political Science 20(2017): 371-390.
15. Kawai, M., Toward a Regional Exchange Rate Regime in East Asia, ADB Institute Discussion Paper No. 68, 2007.
16. Kenen, P., “The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View.” in Robert A. M. and Alexandre K. S. (eds.): Monetary Problems of the International Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969: 41-60.
17. Lane, P. R., and Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria, The External Wealth of Nations Database, Brookings Institution, https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-external-wealth-of-nations-database/, Retrieved on September 20, 2022.
18. Lee, K., Schumpeterian analysis of economic catch-up: Knowledge, path-creation, and the middle-income trap, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
19. Lee, K., The Art of Economic Catch-Up. Barriers, Detours and Leapfrogging in Innovation Systems, Cambridge, UK: Cambrdige University Press, 2019.
20. McKinnon, R. I., “Optimum Currency Areas.” The American Economic Review 53(No. 4 1963): 717-725.
21. McKinnon, R. I., Money in International Exchange. The Convertible Currency System, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.
22. McKinnon, R. I., Exchange Rates Under the East Asian Dollar Standard, Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 2005.
23. Mundell, R. A., “A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas.” The American Economic Review 51(No. 4 1961): 657-665.
24. OEC, Observatory on Economic Complexity, MIT Media Lab, http://oec.world, Retrieved on July 2, 2023.
25. Papadimitriou, D. B., Zezza, G., and Hannsgen, G., Can Global Imbalances Continue? Policies for the U.S. Economy, Strategic Analysis, November, 2006.
26. Reinhart, C., and Calvo, G. A., “Fear of floating.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (No. 2 2002): 379-408.
27. Rochon, L. and Rossi, S., “The Euro-Area Crisis and the Monetary Policy Response of the ECB: A Critical Investigation and Some Reform Proposals.” Forum for Social Economics(August 2023).
28. Rueff, J., “Gold exchange standard a danger to the West.” in Herbert G. Grubel (ed.) World Monetary Reform. Plans and Issues. Stanford and London: Stanford University Press and Oxford University Press, 1963: 320-28.
29. Schoder, C. “The fundamentals of sovereign debt sustainability: evidence from 15 OECD countries.” Empirica 41(No. 2 2014): 247-271.
30. World Bank, Gross External Debt Position, https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/debt-statistics/qeds Retrieved on May 20, 2023.