Editorial BoardXML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 36 , No. 4

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 389-424
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Nov 2023
Received 24 Oct 2023 Revised 10 Nov 2023 Accepted 10 Nov 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22904/sje.2023.36.4.002

Do single-sex schools make girls less interested in predominantly male majors?
Jihye Kam ; Yuseob Lee
Assistant Professor, Sungshin Women’s University, Department of Social Studies Education, South Korea (jkam@sungshin.ac.kr)
Assistant Professor, Harbin Institute of Technology-Shenzhen, School of Economics and Management, China (yuseoblee@hit.edu.cn)

JEL Classification: C39; I20; J16


Abstract

This study estimates the impact of single-sex schooling on the gender gap in students’ choice of college major. Potential endogeneity concerns are mitigated by homogeneous application behavior under the Boston mechanism-type assignment into high schools and college-major-specific admissions policies in South Korea. Single-sex schooling is found to widen the gender gap in the choice of predominantly male majors by attracting girls to genderbalanced majors and boys to predominantly male majors. Recruiting more male mathematics and science teachers, while maintaining the share of female teachers at a certain level, could encourage girls in single-sex schools to pursue predominantly male majors.


Keywords: College major choice, Gender gap, Single-sex schools, Teacher gender

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on, but with significant revised on, the third chapter, “Do single-sex schools make girls less interested in science and engineering majors?,” of Yuseob Lee’s doctoral dissertation titled “Three Essays in Labor Economics” (2018, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison). We thank conference participants at the American Economic Association, Association for Education Finance and Policy, and Southern Economic Association for helpful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are our own. Authors contributed equally to this paper.


References
1. Anelli, M., & Peri, G., “The Effects of High School Peers’ Gender on College Major, college performance and income.” The Economic Journal 129(No. 618 2019): 553-602.
2. Angrist, J. D., “The Perils of Peer Effect.” Labour Economics 30(2014): 98-108.
3. Avery, C., Lee, S., & Roth, A. E., College Admissions as Non-Price Competition: The Case of South Korea, NBER Working Paper No. w20774, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2014.
4. Barres, B., “Does Gender Matter?” Nature 442(2006): 133-136.
5. Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T., “Do Faculty Serve as Role Models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students.” American Economic Review 95(No. 2 2005):152-157.
6. Bigler, R. S., & Signorella, M. L., “Single-Sex Education: New Perspectives and Evidence on A Continuing Controversy.” Sex Roles 65(No. 9-10 2011): 659-669.
7. Billger, S. M., “On Reconstructing School Segregation: The Efficacy and Equity of Single-Sex Schooling.” Economics of Education Review 28(No. 3 2009): 393-402.
8. Bordon, P., & Fu, C., “College-Major Choice to College-then-Major Choice.” The Review of Economic Studies 82 (No. 4 2015): 1247-1288.
9. Brown, C., & Corcoran, M., “Sex Based Differences in School Content and the Male-Female Wage Gap.” Journal of Labor Economics 15(No.3 1997): 431-465.
10. Carrell, S. E., Hoekstra, M., & Kuka, E., “The Long-Run Effects of Disruptive Peers.” American Economic Review 108(No. 11 2018): 3377-3415.
11. Carrington, B., Francis, B., Hutchings, M., Skelton, C., Read, B., & Hall, I., “Does the Gender of the Teacher Really Matter? Sevento Eight-Year-Olds’ Accounts of Their Interactions with Their Teachers.” Educational Studies 33(No. 4 2007): 397-413.
12. Cho, S., Kam, J., & Lee, S., “Efficient Supply of Human Capital: Role of College Major.” The Singapore Economic Review 63(No. 5 2018): 1319-1343.
13. Choi, J., Park, H., & Behrman, J. R., “Separating Boys and Girls and Increasing Weight? Assessing the Impacts of Single-Sex Schools through Random Assignment in Seoul.” Social Science & Medicine 134(2015): 1-11.
14. Dee, T. S., “A Teacher like Me: Does Race, Ethnicity, or Gender Matter?” American Economic Review 95(No. 2 2005): 158-165.
15. Dee, T. S., “Teachers and the Gender Gaps in Student Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 42(No. 3 2007): 528-554.
16. Duncan, O D., & Duncan, B., “A Methodological Analysis of Segregation Indexes.” American Sociological Review 20(No. 2 1955): 210-217.
17. Eisenkopf, G., Hessami, Z., Fischbacher, U., & Ursprung, H. W., “Academic Performance and Single-Sex Schooling: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Switzerland.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 115(2015): 123-143.
18. Evans, W. N., Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M., “Measuring Peer Group Effects: A Study of Teenage Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 100(No. 5 1992): 966-991.
19. Gill, A. M., & Leigh, D. E., “Community College Enrollment, College Major, and the Gender Wage Gap.” Industrial & Labor Relations Review 54(No. 1 2000): 163-181.
20. Goldin, C., Katz, L., & Kuziemko, I., “The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(No. 4 2006): 133-156.
21. Halpern, D. F., Eliot, L., Bigler, R. S., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Hyde, J., Liben, L. S., & Martin, C. L., “The Pseudoscience of Single-Sex Schooling.” Science 333(No. 6050 2011): 1706-1707.
22. Holmlund, H., & Sund, K., “Is the Gender Gap in School Performance Affected by the Sex of the Teacher?” Labour Economics 15(No. 1 2008): 37-53.
23. Hoxby, C. M., “The Power of Peers: How Does the Makeup of a Classroom Influence Achievement.” Education next 2(No. 2 2002): 56-63.
24. Kam, J. H., Academic and Social Integration of Korean Male College Students after Their Military Obligation, Unpublished manuscript, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 2016.
25. Kang, C., “Classroom Peer Effects and Academic Achievement: Quasi-Randomization Evidence from South Korea.” Journal of Urban Economics 61(No. 3 2007): 458-495.
26. Kessels, U., & Hannover, B., “When Being a Girl Matters Less: Accessibility of Gender-Related Self-Knowledge in Single-Sex and Coeducational Classes and Its Impact on Students’ Physics-Related Self-Concept of Ability.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 78, (No. 2 2008): 273-289.
27. Kim, D., “Growth in College Education and Wage Differentials in Korea.” Seoul Journal of Economics 18(No. 2 2005): 87-123.
28. Kim, T., Lee, J. H., & Lee, Y., “Mixing versus Sorting in Schooling: Evidence from the Equalization Policy in South Korea.” Economics of Education Review 27(No. 6 2008): 697-711.
29. Lavy, V., & Schlosser, A., “Mechanisms and Impacts of Gender Peer Effects at School.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3(No. 2 2011): 1-33.
30. Lee, L. F., “Identification and Estimation of Econometric Models with Group Interactions, Contextual Factors and Fixed Effects.” Journal of Econometrics 140(No. 2 2007): 333-374.
31. Lee, J., “A Study on General High School Allocation System and Related Issues in Educational Equalized Area.” Secondary Education Research 64(No. 3 2016): 725-749.
32. Lee, S., Turner, L. J., Woo, S., & Kim, K., The Impact of School and Classroom Gender Composition on Educational Achievement, Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, 2015.
33. Lim, J., & Meer, J., “The Impact of Teacher-Student Gender Matches: Random Assignment Evidence from South Korea.” Journal of Human Resources 52(No. 4 2017): 979-997.
34. Lu, F., & Anderson, M. L., “Peer Effects in Microenvironments: The Benefits of Homogeneous Classroom Groups.” Journal of Labor Economics 33(No. 1 2015): 91-122.
35. Manski, C. F., “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” The Review of Economic Studies 60(No. 3 1993): 531-542.
36. McDonald, J. A., & Thornton, R. J., “Do New Male and Female College Graduates Receive Unequal Pay?” Journal of Human Resources 42(No. 1 2007): 32-48.
37. Moffitt, R. A., “Policy Interventions, Low-Level Equilibria, and Social Interactions” in: S. Durlauf and P. Young (Eds.): Social Dynamics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001: 45-82.
38. O’Neill, J., “The Gender Gap in Wages, Circa 2000.” American Economic Review 93(No. 2 2003): 309-314.
39. Park, H., Behrman, J. R., & Choi, J., “Causal Effects of Single-Sex Schools on College Entrance Exams and College Attendance: Random Assignment in Seoul High Schools.” Demography 50(No. 2 2013): 447-469.
40. Patterson, M. M., “Self-Perceived Gender Typicality, Gender-Typed Attributes, and Gender Stereotype Endorsement in Elementary-School-Aged Children.” Sex roles 67(No. 7-8 2012): 422-434.
41. Pahlke, E., Bigler, R. S., & Patterson, M. M., “Reasoning about Single-Sex Schooling for Girls among Students, Parents, and Teachers.” Sex Roles 71(No. 5-8 2014): 261-271.
42. Pahlke, E., Hyde, J. S., & Allison, C. M., “The Effects of Single-Sex Compared with Coeducational Schooling on Students’ Performance and Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 140(No. 4 2014): 1042-1072.
43. Sohn, H., “Mean and Distributional Impact of Single-Sex High Schools on Students’ Cognitive Achievement, Major choice, and Test-Taking Behavior: Evidence from A Random Assignment Policy in Seoul, Korea.” Economics of Education Review 52(2016): 155-175.
44. Sullivan, A., “Academic Self-Concept, Gender and Single-Sex Schooling.” British Educational Research Journal 35(No. 2 2009): 259-288.
45. Turner, S. E., & Bowen, W. G., “Choice of Major: The Changing (unchanging) Gender Gap.” Industrial & Labor Relations Review 52(No. 2 1999): 289-313.
46. Whitmore, D., “Resource and Peer Impacts on Girls’ Academic Achievement: Evidence from A Randomized Experiment.” American Economic Review 95(No. 2 2005): 199-203.
47. Winters, M. A., Haight, R. C., Swaim, T. T., & Pickering, K. A., “The Effect of Same-Gender Teacher Assignment on Student Achievement in the Elementary and Secondary Grades: Evidence from Panel Data.” Economics of Education Review 34(2013): 69-75.
48. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K., Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
49. Zafar, B., “College Major Choice and the Gender Gap.” Journal of Human Resources 48(No. 3 2013): 545-595.