Editorial BoardXML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 21 , No. 4

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 579-606
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Nov 2008
Received 16 Feb 2007 Revised 27 Oct 2008

Estimating Best Response Functions with Strategic Substitutability
Jabonn Kim
Research Fellow, Korea Institute of Finance, Banker's building, 4-1 Myoung- Dong 1-Ga, Chung-Ku, Seoul 100-021, Korea, Tel: +82-2-3705-6277 (jbkim@kif.re.kr)

JEL Classification: C30, D40, G21


Abstract

This paper is concerned with bank's strategic behaviors when substitutability between banking services is assumed. Best response functions and Nash equilibria may be better described by nonlinearity than by linearity. The nonlinearity is dependent on the nonlinearity of demand function, regardless of whether it is an individual or a market demand function. In the linear model, the dynamics and properties of a Nash equilibrium may be a priori, straight forward and trivial. However, nonlinearity contains the diverse possibility of dynamics, describing the game more realistically and carrying rich economic implications. Using nonlinear functions, our study investigates the game between banks with ATMs, telebanking and internet banking services, and discusses the existence of stable Nash equilibria and the possibility of collusion between players. It is also found that developing information technology accelerates the transformation of traditional banking services into electronic banking services.


Keywords: Linearity, Nonlinearity, Best response function, Nash equilibrium, Cournot competition, Bertrand competition, Collusion

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to two anonymous referees for their valuable comments. I also have benefited from seminar participants at Seoul National University and Yonsei University.


References
1. Allen, Franklin, McAndrews, James J., and Strahan, Philip. “E-Finance: an introduction.” Journal of Financial Services Research 22 (No. 1 2002): 5-27.
2. Berger, Allen N. “The economic effects of technological progress: evidence from the banking industry.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 35 (No. 2 2003): 141-172.
3. Bertrand, J. “Theorie Mathematique de la Richesse Sociale.” Journal des Savants 67 (Septembre 1883): 499-508.
4. Giannakoudi, Sofia. “Internet banking: the digital voyage of banking and money in cyberspace.” Information & Communication Technology Law 8 (No. 3 1999): 205-43.
5. Hausman, Jerry A. “Specification tests in econometrics.” Econometrica 46 (No. 5 1978): 1251-71.
6. Kauffman, Robert J., McAndrews, James, and Wang, Yu-Ming. “Opening the ‘black box’ of network externalities in network adoption.” Information Systems Research 11 (No. 1 2000): 61-82.
7. Kim, Jabonn. “Asymptotic relationship between OLS and 2SLS wih weak instruments.” Korean Economic Journal 44 (Nos. 3-4 2005): 587-605.
8. Kim, Jabonn. Recent Development of Electronic Finance in Korea. Korea Institute of Finance, 2006 (in Korean).
9. Korea Institute of Finance. Understanding on the Digital Finance. Seoul, Korea: KIF Press, 2003 (in Korean).
10. Lee, Choong-Lyul, Kim, Jae-Pil, and Lee, Young Soo. Digital Banking. Seoul, Korea: Hong Press, 2000 (in Korean).
11. Lee, Sanche. “The survival and competition of retail electronic payment instruments.” Review of Financial Economics 15 (No. 2 2001): 61-85 (in Korean).
12. McAndrews, James J. “E-money and payment system risks.” Comtemporary Economic Policy 17 (No. 3 1999): 348-57.
13. Tirole, Jean. The Theory of Industrial Organization. USA: MIT Press, 1988.
14. Wang, Kyu Ho, and Cho, In-Koo. Game Theory. Seoul, Korea: ParkYoungSa, 2004 (in Korean).