Editorial BoardXML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 18 , No. 4

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 303-324
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Nov 2005
Received 08 Jul 2005 Revised 30 Nov 2005

Demand Uncertainty and the Choice of Business Model in the Semiconductor Industry
Yingyi Tsai ; Ching-Tang Wu
Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Economics, National University of Kaohsiung, Nan-Tzu Dist., Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan, Tel: +886-7-591-9189 (yytsai@nuk.edu.tw)
Associate Professor, Department of Applied Mathematics, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30050, Taiwan, Tel: +886-3-513-1220 (ctwu@math.nctu.edu.tw)

Funding Information ▼

JEL Classification: D24, D40, D81, E22, L23


Abstract

In this paper, we provide another reason that may explain the wide adoption of outsourcing approach in the semiconductor industry. We show the fab-lite business model of outsourcing wafer fabrication to foundries is optimal in the presence of demand uncertainty. This is because outsourcing helps the integrated device manufacturer (largely the brand-producing firm) to lower its cost of capital investment in the case of low demand and to improve its capacity allocation in the case of high demand.


Keywords: Outsourcing, Capital investment, Uncertainty

Acknowledgments

We thank the Editor, anonymous referees, Justin Yifu Lin, CY Lu, Preston McAfee, Abhinay Muthoo, Roderick James McCrorie, and Hao Wang for their valuable suggestions and comments. We would also like to thank the seminar participants at the China Center for Economic Research (CCER) for providing important comments. The authors are greatly indebted to the National Science Council, Taiwan for the research grant (#NSC 92-2115-M-39-002-).


References
1. Abel, A. B., Dixit, A. K., Eberly, J. C., and Pindyck, R. S. “Options, the Value of Capital, and Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (No. 3 1996): 753-77.
2. Abraham, K. G., and Taylor, S. K. “Firm's Use of Outside Contractors: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Labor Economics 14 (No. 3 1996): 394-424.
3. Caballero, R. “On the Sign of the Investment-Uncertainty Relationship.” American Economic Review 81 (No. 1 1991): 279-88.
4. Deavers, K. L. “Outsourcing: A Corporate Competitiveness Strategy, Not a Search for Low Wages.” Journal of Labor Research 18 (No. 4 1997): 503-19.
5. Dixit, A. K., and Pindyck, R. S. Expandability, Reversibility, and Optimal Capacity Choice. Working Paper No. 6373, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1998.
6. Fabless Semiconductor Association (FSA). Publications - Outsourcing Trends. Available at http://www.fsa.org/pubs/outsourcing Trends/default.asp, 2003.
7. Feenstra, R. C., and Hanson, G. H. “Globalization, Outsourcing and Wage Inequality.” American Economic Review 86 (No. 2 1996): 240-5.
8. Föllmer, H., and Schied, A. Stochastic Finance. An Introduction in Discrete Time. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2002.
9. Grossman, G., and Helpman, E. “Integration versus Outsourcing in Industry Equilibrium.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (No. 1 2002): 85-120.
10. Hartman, R. “The Effects of Price and Cost Uncertainty on Investment.” Journal of Economic Theory 5 (No. 2 1972): 258-66.
11. Levhari, D., and Peles, Y. “Market Structure, Quality and Durability.” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4 (No. 1 1973): 235-48.
12. Pindyck, R. S. “Irreversible Investment, Capacity Choice, and the Value of the Firm.” American Economic Review 78 (No. 5 1988): 969-85.
13. Pindyck, R. S. “A Note on Competitive Investment under Uncertainty.” American Economic Review 83 (No. 1 1993): 273-7.
14. Sandmo, A. “On the Theory of the Competitive Firm under Price Uncertainty.” American Economic Review 61 (No. 1 1971): 65-73.
15. Shy, O., and Stenbacka, R. “Strategic Outsourcing.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 50 (No. 2 2003): 203-24.