Editorial BoardXML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 33 , No. 4

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 487-504
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Nov 2020
Received 28 Sep 2020 Accepted 28 Sep 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22904/sje.2020.33.4.001

Varieties of Capitalism and re-thinking the East Asian model of economic growth after the Covid-19: Rebalancing shareholder and stakeholder capitalism
Keun Lee
Keun Lee, Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea, Tel: +82 2 880 6367 (kenneth@snu.ac.kr)

Funding Information ▼

JEL Classification: F32, F59, O16, O19, P12, I21


East Asian economies had shown remarkable performance of high growth and low inequality, thereby forming a separate East Asian capitalism group within the VoC (variety of capitalism) typologies. There are strong signs that these economies have recently been converging to the LME (liberal market economy group), featuring low growth and high inequality, since the 2000s. Financialisation is arguably one cause for these outcomes of low growth and high inequality. This paper re-evaluates East Asian capitalism in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, which has suddenly halted globalisation and further questioned the superiority of shareholder capitalism associated with financialisation and globalisation. It proposes rebalancing between shareholder and stakeholder capitalism. By doing so, East Asian economies can be reborn as a hybrid capitalism, with East Asian capitalism at its original core, to restore their growth momentum in an inclusive way. It is also argued that the post-pandemic retreat of globalisation is a good opportunity to restore autonomy in domestic economic policymaking over interest rates and exchange rates, while allowing some adjustments over formerly excessive capital mobility.

Keywords: East Asian model, Globalization, Covid-19, Shareholder capitalism, Stake-holder capitalism


This paper has first been written as a part of the project sponsored by the Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute based in Berlin, Germany. The author thanks Vladimir Popov for providing useful comments as a guest editor. The author also acknowledges the support by the Laboratory Program for Korean Studies through the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the Korean Studies Promotion Service of the Academy of Korean Studies (AKS2018LAB-1250001).

1. Acemoglu, Daron, James A. Robinson, and Thierry Verdier. “Can’t We All Be More Like Scandinavians? Asymmetric Growth and Institutions in an Interdependent World.” MIT Department of Economics Working Paper No. 12-22 (2012).
2. Aghion, Philippe, Helene Maghin, and André Sapir. “Covid and the nature of capitalism.” Working paper. Vox EU (2020). (https://voxeu.org/article/covid-and-nature-capitalism/)
3. Alvarez, Ignacio. “Financialization, non-financial corporations and income inequality: the. case of France.” Socio-Economic Review 13 (No. 3 2015), 449-475.
4. Dore, Ronald, William Lazonick, and Mary O’sullivan. “Varieties of capitalism in the twentieth century.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 15 (No. 4 1999): 102-120.
5. Ferrari-Filho, Fernando, and Luiz Fernando De Paula. “Exchange rate regime proposal for emerging countries: a Keynesian perspective.” Journal of post Keynesian economics 31 (No. 2 2008): 227-248.
6. Godechot, Olivier. “Is finance responsible for the rise in wage inequality in France?” Socio-Economic Review 10 (No. 3 2012): 447-470.
7. Hacker, Jacob S., and Paul Pierson. "Winner-take-all politics: Public policy, political organization, and the precipitous rise of top incomes in the United States." Politics & Society 38 (No. 2 2010): 152-204.
8. Kim, A. R., and M. H. Cho. “Types of foreign investors, dividend and investment policy: An empirical study of Korean firms.” Journal of Strategic Management 11 (No. 1 2008): 25-42.
9. Kim, Sung- Young, and Elizabeth Thurbon. “ Developmental environmentalism: Explaining South Korea’s ambitious pursuit of green growth.” Politics & Society 43 (No. 2 2015): 213-240.
10. Kus, Basak. “Financialisation and income inequality in OECD nations: 1995-2007.” The Economic and Social Review 43 (No. 4 2012): 477-495.
11. Lazonick, William. “Innovative business models and varieties of capitalism: Financialization of the US corporation.” Business History Review 84 (No.4 2010): 675-702.
12. Lazonick, William. “Profits without prosperity.” Harvard Business Review 92 (No. 9 2014): 46-55.
13. Lazonick, William, and Jang-Sup Shin. Predatory Value Extraction: How the Looting of the Business Corporation Became the US Norm and How Sustainable Prosperity Can Be Restored. Oxford University Press, 2019.
14. Lee, Chung H., Keun Lee, and Kangkook Lee. “Chaebols, financial liberalization and economic crisis: transformation of quasi-internal organization in Korea.” Asian Economic Journal 16 (No. 1 2002): 17-35.
15. Lee, Keun. Economic catch-up and technological leapfrogging: The path to development and macroeconomic stability in Korea. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016.
16. Lee, Keun., B.Y. Kim, Y.Y. Park, and E. Sanidas. “Big Businesses and Economic Growth: Identifying a Binding Constraint for Growth with Country Panel Analysis.” Journal of Comparative Economics 41 (No. 2 2013): 561-582.
17. Lee, Keun, Kim Ginil, Hong Kee Kim, and Hong-Sun Song, “New Macro- Financial System for a Stable and Crisis-resilient Growth in Korea.” Seoul Journal of Economics 23 (No. 2 2010): 145-186.
18. Lee, Keun, and Hochul Shin. “Varieties of capitalism and East Asia: Long-term evolution, structural change, and the end of East Asian capitalism.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics (2018).
19. Lee, Keun, Ho-Chul Shin, and Jongho Lee. “From Catch-up to Convergence? Re-casting the Trajectory of Capitalism in South Korea.” Korean Studies 44 (No. 1 2020): 54-79.
20. Lin, Ken-Hou, and Donald Tomaskovic-Devey. “Financialization and US income inequality, 1970–2008.” American Journal of Sociology 118 (No. 5 2013): 1284-1329.
21. Nayyar, Deepak (Ed.). Asian Transformations: An Inquiry into the Development of Nations. Oxford University Press, 2019.
22. Ostry, J. D. et al. “Capital inflows: The role of controls.” Revista de Economia Institucional 12 (No. 23 2010): 135-164.
23. Ostry, J. D. D.B.S. “Capital inflows: the role of controls.” IMF Staff Position Note SPN/10/04 (2010).
24. Popov, Vladimir. “Which economic model is more competitive? The West and the South after the Covid-19 pandemic.” Working paper (2020).
25. Shin, Hochul, and Keun Lee. “Impact of financialization and financial development on inequality: Panel cointegration results using OECD data.” Asian Economic Papers 18 (No. 1 2019): 69-90.
26. Shin, Jang-Sup, and Ha-Joon Chang. Restructuring 'Korea Inc.': Financial Crisis, Corporate Reform, and Institutional Transition. London and New York: Routledge Curzon, 2003.
27. Soskice, David, and P. A. Hall. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
28. Stabilini, A. “Revision of the Shareholders Rights Directive: It’s a Long Way Home.” Lexology (July 14, 2015).
29. Stockhammer, Engelbert. “Why have wage shares fallen?” ILO, Conditions of Work and Employment Series 35 (No. 61 2013): 1-61.
30. Thurbon, Elizabeth. Developmental mindset: The revival of financial activism in South Korea. Ithaca, Ny: Cornell University Press, 2016.
31. Thurbon, Elizabeth. “Ideational Inconsistency and Institutional Incapacity: Why Financial Liberalisation in South Korea Went Horribly Wrong.” New Political Economy 8 (No. 3 2003): 341-361.
32. Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald, Ken-Hou Lin, and Nathan Meyers. “Did financialization reduce economic growth?” Socio-Economic Review 13 (No. 3 2015): 525-548.
33. Williamson, John. Crawling Bands or Monitoring Bands: How to Manage Exchange Rates in a World of Capital Mobility. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 1999.
34. Williamson, John. “What Washington means by policy reform.” Latin American adjustment: How much has happened 1 (1990): 90-120.
35. World Bank. The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
36. Zeiler, David. “Why Facebook Inc. (Nasdaq: FB) Stock Is a Bet on the Future.” Money Morning (April 18, 2014).