Editorial BoardXML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 29 , No. 1
[Paper List] [Go to Volume List]

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1-42
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 29 Feb 2016
Received 21 Oct 2015 Revised 23 Dec 2015 Accepted 01 Feb 2016

Comparing the Management Practices and Productive Efficiency in Korean and Japanese Firms: An Interview Survey Approach
Keun Lee ; Tsutomu Miyagawa ; Young Gak Kim ; Kazuma Edamura
Professor, Department of Economics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Tel: 82-2-880-6367, Fax: 82-2-886-4231 (Kenneth@snu.ac.kr)
Corresponding author, Faculty of Economics, Gakushuin University, 1-5-1 Mejiro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 171-8588, Japan, Tel: 81-3-5992-2257, Fax: 81-3-5992-1007 (19990230@gakushuin.ac.jp)
Associate professor, School of Economics, Senshu University, Tel: 81-44-900-7979, Fax: 81-44-900-7849 (ykim@isc.senshu-u.ac.jp)
Research Fellow, the 2nd Theory-Oriented Research Group, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Tel: 81-3-5775-2651 (edamura@nistep.go.jp)

Funding Information ▼

JEL Classification: D21, L23, M11, M12, M15, M51

Abstract

In this study, we conduct interview surveys on management practices in Japanese and Korean firms following the study of Bloom, and Van Reenen (2007). The average management scores in Japanese firms are higher than those in Korean firms, and human resource management is positively associated with firm performance. When a Korean dummy is added as a shift term in regressions with the merged sample, its coefficient is negative, implying that Korean firms have low efficiency. However, when the cross terms of the Korean dummy are added with capital and labor, the significance of the shift term disappears. This observation entails that any efficiency difference between the two countries does not come from a technical efficiency (shift term) but from a factor efficiency (marginal productivity of labor and capital). One robust result of this study is that a high output elasticity of capital is observed in Korean firms, whereas a high output elasticity of labor is noted in Japanese firms despite the high capital ― labor ratios in the former. One interpretation of this puzzle is that Japanese firms have pursued the optimization of labor uses and have been relying on labor-saving growth in the face of labor shortage and aging and that Korean firms have relied on capital for growth, continuously renovating and updating their capital, thereby recording a high capital productivity in contempt of aggressive labor.

Keywords: Factor efficiency, Intangible assets, Management practices
Acknowledgments

This paper is a revised version of the Research Institute of Economy, Trade, and Industry (RIETI) Discussion Paper 10-e-013 and has been presented at various occasions, such as the 2015 Seoul Journal of Economics Symposium, a seminar at RIETI, the Comparative Analysis of Enterprise (Micro) Data Tokyo Conference held in October 2009, a seminar at Waseda University, and a workshop at Gakushuin Univeristy entitled “Intangibles, Innovation Policy, and Economic Growth.” We would like to express our gratitude to Professors Mitsuhiro Fukao, Haruo Horaguchi, Masahisa Fujita, Kyoji Fukao, Kozo Kiyota, Jeong-Dong Lee, Jonathan Haskel, Hideaki Miyajima, Masayuki Morikawa, Min-Jung Kim, other participants of these meetings, and the members of the project entitled “Research on Intangible Assets in Japan.” at RIETI. We are also grateful to Professors Takizawa and Kawakami for their excellent research assistance. The interview survey was supported by Japan Center for Economic Research and Nikkei Inc. The first author acknowledges the support by the Korean government through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2013S1A3A2053312).

References
1. Aoki, Masahiko. Corporations in Evolving Diversity, Cognition, Governance, and Institutions. Oxford University Press, 2010.
2. Bloom, Nick, and John. Van Reenen. “Measuring and Explaining Management Practices across Firms and Countries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (No. 4 2007): 1351-408.
3. Bloom, Nick, Renata Lemos, Raffaella Sadun, Daniela Scur, and John Van Reenen. “The New Empirics of Management.” Journal of the European Economic Association 12 (No. 4 2014): 835-76.
4. Chun, Hyunbae, Tsutomu Miyagawa, HakKil Pyo, and Konomi Tonogi. Do Intangibles Contribute to Productivity Growth in East Asian Countries? RIETI Discussion Paper Series No. 15-E-055, 2015.
5. Corrado, Carol, Charles Hulten, and Daniel Sichel. “Measuring Capital and Technology: An Extended Framework.” In C. Corrado, J. Haltiwanger, and D. Sichel (eds.), Measuring Capital in the New Economy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 11-46, 2005.
6. Corrado, Carol, Charles Hulten, and Daniel Sichel. “Intangible Capital and U.S. Economic Growth.” The Review of Income and Wealth 55 (No. 3 2009): 661-85.
7. Corrado, Carol, Jonathan Haskel, Cecilia Jona-Lasinio, and MassimilianoIommi. Intangibles and Industry Productivity Growth: Evidence from the EU. INTAN Invest Discussion Paper, 2014.
8. Fukao, Kyoji, TsutomuMiyagawa, KentaroMukai, YukioShinoda, and KonomiTonogi. “Intangible Investment in Japan: Measurement and Contribution to Economic Growth.” Review of Income and Wealth 55 (No. 3 2009): 717-36.
9. Fukao, Kyoji,Tomohiko Inui, ShigesaburoKabe, and Dequiang Liu. “An International Komparison of the TFP Levels of Japanese, South Korean, and Chinese Listed Firms.” Seoul Journal of Economics 21 (No. 1 2008): 5-38.
10. Hao, Janet, V. Manole, and Bart.van Ark. Intangible Assets in Europe: Measurement and International Comparability. Final Conference of EUKLEMS Project, Groningen, 2008.
11. Ichikowski, Casey. Human Resources Management Systems and the Performance of U.S. Manufacturing Businesses. NBER Working Paper No. 3449, 1990.
12. Joo, Si Hyung., and Keun Lee. “Samsung’s Catch-up with Sony: An Analysis Using U.S. Patent Data.” Journal of the Asia-Pacific Economy 15 (No. 3 2010): 271-87.
13. Jung, Mooseop, and Keun Lee. “Sectoral Systems of Innovations and Productivity Catch-up by the Korean Firms with the Japanese Firms.” Industrial and Corporate Change 19 (No. 4 2010): 1037-69.
14. Jung, Moosup, Keun Lee, and Kyoji Fukao. “Total Factor Productivity of Korean Firms and Catching up with the Japanese Firms.” Seoul Journal of Economics 21 (No. 1 2008): 93-139.
15. Kanamori, Takahito, and Kazuyuki Motohashi. Centralization or Decentralization of Decision Rights? Impact on IT Performance of Firms. RIETI Discussion Paper Series No. 06-E-032, 2006.
16. Kurokawa, Futoshi, and Kazunori Minetaki. “How Can IT Raise Productivity Linked with Workplace Re-organization and Human Capital in Japan?” The Economic Analysis 178 (2006): 54-95 (in Japanese).
17. Lee, Keun, Tsutomu Miyagawa, Sheigesaburo Kabe, J. Lee, H. Kim, and YounGak Kim. Management Practices and Firm Performance in Japanese and Korean Firms. JCER Discussion Paper No. 120, 2009.
18. Lee, Keun, and Moosup Jung. “Resource-saving Growth Strategy and Main Manufacturing Firms in Korea.” In H Lim, et al. (eds.), Sustainable Development Model for Korea and Growth Engines. Seoul: Nanam Press, 2009 (in Korean).
19. Marrano, Mauro, G., Jonathan Haskel, and Gavin Wallis. “What Happened to the Knowledge Economy? ICT, Intangible Investment and Britain’s Productivity Record Revisited.” Review of Income and Wealth 55 (No. 3 2009): 686-716.
20. McGrattan, Ellen, and Edward Prescott. Expensed and Sweat Equity. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Working Paper No. 636, 2005.
21. McGrattan, Ellen, and Edward Prescott. “Unmeasured Investment and the Puzzling U.S. Boom in the 1990s.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (No. 4 2010): 88-123.
22. Miyagawa, Tsutomu, Keun Lee, YounGak Kim, Hosung Jung, and KazumaEdamura. “Has the Management Quality in Korean Firms Caught Up with That in Japanese Firms? An Empirical Study Using Interview Surveys.” In Ahmed Bounfour and Tsutomu Miyagawa (eds.), Intangibles, Market Failure, and Innovation Performance. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015.
23. Miyagawa, Tsutomu, Masahiko Ozaki, Atsushi Kawakami, and Kazuma Edamura. Organizational Reform and Firm Performance in Japan. RIETI Discussion Paper Series No.08-J-062, 2008 (in Japanese).
24. Miyagawa, Tsutomu, and Miho Takizawa. “Productivity Differences between Japan and Korea and the Role of Intangible Assets.” In K. Asako, N. Iiduka, and T. Miyagawa (eds.), Great Recessions in the Global Economy and Business Cycle Analysis. The University of Tokyo Press, 2011 (in Japanese).
25. Pyo, HakKil, Hyunbae Chun, and KeunHee Rhee. “Productivity Growth in the Republic of Korea.” The First Asia KLEMS Conference, July 27, 2011.
26. Shinozaki, Akihiko. “Effective Reforms with Information Technology: Logit Model Analysis on Business Process Reengineering, Business Unit Restructuring, and Human Resource Management.” The Economic Analysis 179 (2007): 36-54 (in Japanese).
 

Editorial Office, Seoul Journal of Economics, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University 599 Gwanangno, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-746, Korea
Tel: +82-2-880-5434 | Fax: +82-2-888-4454 | E-mail: sje@plaza.snu.ac.kr
Copyright (c) 2020 SJE. All rights reserved.