Editorial BoardXML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 25 , No. 3

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 255-277
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Aug 2012
Received 14 Jul 2010 Revised 24 May 2011 Accepted 16 Jun 2012

Optimal Contracts of Public-Private Partnerships with Demand Risk
Daechang Kang
Research Fellow, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, 246 Yangjaedaero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-747, Korea, Tel: +82-2-3460-1166, Fax: +82-2-3460-1044 (dkang@kiep.go.kr)

JEL Classification: D8, H54, H57, L5


Abstract

The paper analyzes the service provision of infrastructure from the aspect of demand risk sharing. The society benefits more under the public-private partnership (PPP) than under government operation, because the government can transfer some risks to private firms through PPP. To reduce total cost, the government is more likely to apply PPP to projects with large risk factors. Using a two-period model, the paper examines the dynamic features of the optimal contract under the PPP. The optimal incentive scheme should be stronger during the second than the first period. As the performance target becomes lower, the incentive power increases in both periods with a higher increase in the first period. As the intertemporal externality becomes stronger, the incentive power increases in both periods with a higher increase in the second period. As the risk or risk aversion increases, the incentive power decreases in both periods, which resembles the static feature.


Keywords: Public-private partnerships, Incentive, Risk sharing, Intertemporal externality

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to the anonymous referees for their helpful comments.


References
1. Bennett, J., and Iossa, E. “Building and Managing Facilities for Public Services.” Journal of Public Economics 90 (Nos. 10-11 2006): 2143-60.
2. Engel, E., Fischer, R., and Galetovic, A. The Basic Public Finance of Public-Private Partnerships. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1618, 2008.
3. GAO. Highway Public-Private Partnerships. Testimony GAO-08-1052T, July 24, 2008.
4. Harris, C. Private Participation in Infrastructure in Developing Countries Trends, Impact, and Policy Lessons. World Bank Working Paper No. 5, The World Bank. 2003.
5. Hart, O. “Incomplete Contracts and Public Ownership: Remarks and an Application to Public-Private Partnerships.” Economic Journal 113 (No. 486 2003): C69-76.
6. Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P. “Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Intertemporal Incentives.” Econometrica 55 (No. 2 1987): 303-28.
7. Iossa, Elisabetta, and Martimort, D. The Simple Micro-Economics of Public-Private Partnerships. CEIS Working Paper No. 139, 2008.
8. Kang, D. An Analysis on Public-Private Partnerships in Korea and Discussion on Development of the System. Unpublished Paper, National Assembly Budget Office, 2006 (in Korean).
9. Kim, Son-Ku. “Optimal Reporting Frequency in Agencies.” Seoul Journal of Economics 18 (No. 1 2005): 1-19.
10. Laffont, J. J., and Martimort, D. The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002.
11. Laffont, J. J., and Tirole, J. A. Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1993.
12. Malhotra, Anil K. “Private Participation in Infrastructure: Lessons from Asia's Power Sector.” Finance&Development 34 (No. 4 1997): 33-5.
13. Martimort, D., and Pouyet, J. “To Build or Not to Build: Normative and Positive Theories of Public-Private Partnerships.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 26 (No. 2 2008): 393-411.
14. Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs. “Equity Transfer of Incheon Airport Railroad.” Press Release, March 31, 2009 (in Korean).
15. Ministry of Planning and Budget. “Performance of PPPs for 10 Years in Korea.” Press Release, August 8, 2007 (in Korean).
16. Rogerson, W. “Repeated Moral Hazard.” Econometrica 53 (No. 1 1985): 69-76.
17. Shleifer, A. “State versus Private Ownership.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (No. 4 1998): 133-50.