Editorial BoardXML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 25 , No. 2

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 137-151
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 30 May 2012
Received 24 Feb 2012 Revised 10 May 2012 Accepted 11 May 2012

Why We Learn Nothing from Regressing Economic Growth on Policies
Dani Rodrik
Rafiq Hariri Professor, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 79 JFK Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA, Tel: +1-617-495-9454, Fax: +1-617-496-5747 (dani_rodrik@harvard.edu)

JEL Classification: O4


Abstract

Government use policy to achieve certain outcomes. Sometimes the desired ends are worthwhile, and sometimes they are pernicious. Cross-country regressions have been the tool of choice in assessing the effectiveness of policies and the empirical relevance of these two diametrically opposite views of government behavior. When government policy responds systematically to economic or political objectives, the standard growth regression in which economic growth (or any other performance indicator) is regressed on policy tells us nothing about the effectiveness of policy and whether government motives are good or bad.


Keywords: Economic growth

Acknowledgments

I thank Bill Easterly, Jon Temple, and participants at the Kennedy School Lunch Group on International Economic Policy (LIEP) for helpful suggestions.


References
1. Ades, Alberto, and di Tella, Rafael. “National Champions and Corruption: Some Unpleasant Interventionist Arithmetic.” The Economic Journal 107 ( No. 443 1997): 1023-42.
2. Barro, Robert J. “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 ( No. 2 1991): 407-43.
3. Besley, Timothy, and Burgess, Robin. Can Labor Regulations Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence from India. London School of Economics, 2002.
4. Djankov, Simeon, La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. “The Regulation of Entry.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 ( No. 1 2002): 1-38.
5. Dollar, David. “Outward-oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976-1985.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 40 ( No. 3 1992): 523-44.
6. Durlauf, Steven, Johnson, Paul, and Temple, Jonathan. “Growth Econometrics.” In P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth. North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 555-677, 2005.
7. Easterly, William. “National Economic Policies and Economic Growth: A Reappraisal.” Forthcoming in P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth. North-Holland, February 2004.
8. Easterly, William, and Rebelo, Sergio. “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Monetary Economics 32 (No. 3 1993): 417-58.
9. Eichengreen, Barry. “Capital Account Liberalization: What Do the Cross-Country Studies Tell Us?” The World Bank Economic Review 15 (No. 3 2001): 341-65.
10. Fischer, Stanley. “The Role of Macroeconomic Factors in Growth.” Journal of Monetary Economics 32 ( No. 3 1993): 485-512.
11. La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. “Government Ownership of Banks.” The Journal of Finance 57 (No. 1 2002): 265-301.
12. Lee, Jong-Wha. “International Trade, Distortions, and Long-Run Economic Growth.” International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 40 ( No. 2 1993): 299-328.
13. Levine, Ross, and Renelt, David. “A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions.” American Economic Review 82 ( No. 4 1992): 942-63.
14. Rajan, Raghuram G., and Zingales, Luigi. “Financial Dependence and Growth.” The American Economic Review 88 ( No. 3 1998): 559-86.
15. Rodriguez, Francisco, and Rodrik, Dani. “Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence.” In Ben Bernanke and Kenneth S. Rogoff (eds.), Macroeconomics Annual 2000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press for NBER, pp. 261-338, 2001.
16. Rodrik, Dani. “Who Needs Capital-Account Convertibility?” In Stanley Fischer and Others, Should the IMF Pursue Capital-Account Convertibility? Essays in International Finance No. 207, International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, May 1998.
17. Rosenzweig, Mark R., and Wolpin, Kenneth I. “Evaluating the Effects of Optimally Distributed Public Programs: Child Health and Family Planning Interventions.” American Economic Review 76 ( No. 3 1986): 470-82.
18. Sachs, Jeffrey, and Warner, Andrew. “Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1 (No. 1 1995): 1-118.
19. Sala-i-Martin, Xavier, Doppelhofer, Gernot, and Miller, Ronald. “Determinants of Long-Term Growth: A Bayesian Averaging of Classical Estimates Approach.” American Economic Review 94 ( No. 4 2004): 813-35.
20. Temple, Jonathan. “The New Growth Evidence.” Journal of Economic Literature 37 ( No. 1 1999): 112-56.
21. Wacziarg, Romain. “Review of Easterly's The Elusive Quest for Growth.Journal of Economic Literature 40 ( No. 3 2002): 907-18.
22. Yanikkaya, Halit. “Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Development Economics 72 ( No. 1 2003): 57-89.