Editorial BoardXML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 27 , No. 2

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 137-147
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 30 May 2014
Received 30 Sep 2013 Revised 21 Nov 2013 Accepted 29 Nov 2013

Effects of Public and Private Schools on Academic Achievement
Sunku Hahn ; Tae-Hwan Kim ; Boyoung Seo
Professor, School of Economics, Yonsei University, Korea, Tel: 82-2-2123-5497, Fax: 82-2-2123-8614 (hahn@yonsei.ac.kr)
Professor, School of Economics, Yonsei University, Korea, Tel: 82-2-2123-5461, Fax: 82-2-2123-8638 (tae-hwan.kim@yonsei.ac.kr)
Graduate Student, Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, USA, Tel: 1-612-625-3923, Fax: 1-612-624-0209 (seoxx114@umn.edu)

JEL Classification: H4, I0, I2


Abstract

The Korean high school system is regulated and monitored by the government to ensure that (i) middle school graduates are randomly assigned to private and public high schools and (ii) the tuitions are the same for both institutions. Hence, any difference between the academic performances of the graduates from private and public high schools is a result from the difference in the schools’ efforts towards the students’ academic achievement. Results show that the students in private schools have better academic performance than those in public schools. Moreover, significant difference exists among boys-only, coed, and girls-only schools. The students’ income level influences their academic performance.


Keywords: Coeducational schools, Private schools, Public schools, Single-sex schools

References
1. Cho, Hyunkuk. “The Effects of Contract Teachers on Academic Achievement.” Kyung-je-hak-yon-ku, 61 (No. 2 2013): 5-29.
2. Chubb, John, and Terry Moe. Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1990.
3. Coleman, James S., Thomas Hoffer, and Sally Kilgore. High School Achievement: Public, Catholic, and Private Schools Compared. New York: Basic Books, 1982.
4. Daly, P. “The Effects of Single-Sex and Coeducational Secondary Schooling on Girls’ Achievement.” Research Papers in Education 11 (No. 3 1996): 289-306.
5. Garcia, D. M. “Single-sex vs. Coeducational Public Schooling for Girls: A High School Comparison Study.” Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 2434A. UMI No. 9839064, 1998.
6. Lee, Hyunchul, and Kyung-Sik Kim. “A Case Study on the Academic Achievement Differences between Men and Women in Co-Education High School of Un-equalized Area.” Korean Social Science Research 37 (No. 1 2013): 173-204.
7. Lee, V. E., and A. S. Bryk. “Effects of Single-Sex Secondary Schools on Student Achievement and Attitudes.” Journal of Educational Psychology 78 (No. 5 1986): 381-95.
8. Marsh, H. W. “Effects of Attending Single-Sex and Coeducational High Schools on Achievement, Attitudes, Behaviors, and Sex Differences.” Journal of Educational Psychology 81 (No. 1 1989): 70-85.
9. Nam, Kigon, and Kisun Sung. “Are Private Schools more Effective than Public Schools?” Korean Labor Economic Dissertation 32 (No. 3 2009): 91-121.
10. Park, Hyunjoon, Jere R. Behrman, and Jaesung Choi. “Causal Effects of Single-Sex Schools on College Entrance Exams and College Attendance: Random Assignment in Seoul High Schools.” Demography 50 (No. 2 2013): 447-69.
11. Peterson, Paul E., and Elena Llaudet. “On the Public-Private School Achievement Debate, American Political Science Association Philadelphia.” KSG Working Paper No. RWP 06-036, 2006.
12. Riordan, C. “Single-gender Schools: Outcomes for African and Hispanic Americans.” Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization 10 (1994): 177-205.
13. Shin, Hyon B. School Enrollment-Social and Economic Characteristics of Students: October 2003. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Commerce, 2005.
14. Thomas, Murray R. Comparing Theories of Child Development. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2005.
15. Woodward, L. J., Fergusson, D. M., and Horwood, L. J. “Effects of single-sex and coeducational secondary schooling on children's academic achievement.” Australian Journal of Education 43 (No. 2 1999): 142-56.