Current Issue

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 38 , No. 1
[Paper List]

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 119-135
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 28 Feb 2025
Received 13 Jan 2025 Revised 13 Feb 2025 Accepted 17 Feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22904/sje.2025.38.1.006

Wealth Effects When the Cost of Effort is Money
Jin Yong Jung
Division of Social Science, Kangnam University, South Korea (jyjung@kangnam.ac.kr)

Funding Information ▼

JEL Classification: D86

Abstract

We study the effects of the agent’s wealth on the agency cost and the principal’s profit in the principal-agent model in which the agent’s effort entails a monetary cost. We show that if the inverse of the marginal utility function is concave in the utility function, then an increase in the agent’s wealth lowers the agency cost for any effort level, directly implying that the principal clearly benefits from such a decrease in the agency cost. However, even if the convexity of the marginal utility function with respect to the utility function is assumed, as in most of the previous results, the effects of the agent's wealth on the agency cost remain unclear in our model. The main reason is because a rise in wealth inevitably makes the incentive problem easier by lowering the marginal cost of effort, reducing the agency cost whereas that convexity raises the agency cost.

Keywords: Wealth effects, Moral hazard, Pecuniary effort, Agency costs
Acknowledgments

This Research was Supported by Kangnam University Research Grants(2022).

References
1. Chade, H., and Vera de Serio, V. N., “Wealth effects and agency costs.” Games and Economic Behavior 86(2014): 1-11.
2. Eeckhoudt, L., and Gollier, C., “The impact of prudence on optimal prevention.” Economic Theory 26(No. 4 2005): 989-994.
3. Fagart, M., and Fluet, C., “The first-order approach when the cost of effort is money.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 49(No. 1 2013): 7-16.
4. Kadan, O., and Swinkels, J. M., “On the moral hazard problem without the first-order approach.” Journal of Economic Theory 148(No. 6 2013): 2313-2343.
5. Kimball, M. S., “Precautionary saving in the small and in the large.” Econometrica 58(No. 1 1990): 53-73.
6. Jullien, B., Salanie, B., and Salanie, F., “Should more risk-averse agents exert more effort?” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 24(No. 1 1999): 19-28.
7. Jung, J. Y., “Effects of changes in preferences in moral hazard problems.” Journal of Economic Theory 205(2022): 105527.
8. Jung, J. Y., “Effects of Wealth and Its Distribution on the Moral Hazard Problem.” Seoul Journal of Economics 30(No. 4 2017): 487-502.
9. Peter, R., “Who should exert more effort? Risk aversion, downside risk aversion and optimal prevention.” Economic Theory 71(No. 4 2021): 1259-1281.
10. Thiele, H., and Wambach, A., “Wealth Effects in the Principal Agent Model.” ournal of Economic Theory 89(No. 2 1999): 247-260.
 

Editorial Office, Seoul Journal of Economics, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University 599 Gwanangno, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-746, Korea
Tel: +82-2-880-5434 | Fax: +82-2-888-4454 | E-mail: sje@plaza.snu.ac.kr
Copyright (c) 2020 SJE. All rights reserved.