Digital Attention Intermediaries

Acknowledgments

This article is based on a report commissioned by the GSMA but prepared in complete independence, which has been released as Peitz (2020) and for which I received useful comments from Serafino Abate, Alexandre de Streel, and Giorgio Monti. I gratefully acknowledge support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through CRC TR 224 (Project B05). Disclosure: I was an external economic expert on the Digital Platform Inquiry of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commision (ACCC) advising on topics related to this article.

References

• ACCC, Digital market inquiry. Final report, https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Digital%20platforms%20inquiry%20-%20final%20report.pdf, , June, 2020.
• Aguiar, L., Waldfogel, J., and Waldfogel, S., “Playlisting favorites: Measuring platform bias in the music industry.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 78(2021). [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2021.102765]
• Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., and Gentzkow, M., “The Welfare Effects of Social Media.” American Economic Review 110(No. 3 2020): 629-676. [https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190658]
• Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., and Song, L., “Digital Addiction.” American Economic Review 112(No. 7 2022): 2424-2463. [https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20210867]
• Ambrus, A., Calvano, E., and Reisinger, M., “Either or Both Competition: A “Two-Sided” Theory of Advertising with Overlapping Viewerships.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 8(No. 6 2016): 189-222. [https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20150019]
• Anderson, S. P., and Coate, S., “Market Provision of Broadcasting: A Welfare Analysis.” Review of Economics Studies 72(No. 4 2005): 947-972. [https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00357]
• Anderson, S. P., Foros, Ø., and Kind, H., “Competition for Advertisers and for Viewers in Media Markets.” Economic Journal 128(No. 608 2018): 34-54. [https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12428]
• Anderson, S. P., and Palma, A., “Competition for attention in the information (overload) Age” The RAND Journal of Economics 43(No. 1 2012): 1-25. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00155.x]
• Anderson, S. P., and Peitz, M., “Media see-saws: Winners and losers in platform markets.” Journal of Economic Theory 186(2020). [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2019.104990]
• Anderson, S. P., and Peitz, M., “Ad Clutter, Time Use, and Media Diversity.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 15(No. 2 2023): 227–270. [https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20210139]
• Armstrong, M., “Competition in Two-Sided Markets.” The RAND Journal of Economics 37(No. 3 2006): 668–691. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x]
• Becker, G. S., and Murphy, K. M., “A Theory of Rational Addiction.” Journal of Political Economy 96(No. 4 1988): 675–700. [https://doi.org/10.1086/261558]
• Belleflamme, P., and Peitz, M., Industrial organization: Markets and strategies, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2015. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707139]
• Belleflamme, P., and Peitz, M., “Inside the Engine Room of Digital Platforms: Reviews, Ratings and Recommendations.” in Ganuza, J. J., and Llobet, G. (eds.): Economic analysis of the digital revolution, Funcas Social and Economic Studies 5. Funcas: Madrid, Spain, 2018a: 75-114. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3128141]
• Belleflamme, P., and Peitz, M., “Platforms and network effects.” in Corchon, L., and Marini, M. (eds.): Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization. vol. II, Edward Elgar, 2018b: 286-317. [https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112789.00019]
• Belleflamme, P., and Peitz, M., “Managing competition on a two-sided platform.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 28(No. 1 2019): 5-22. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12311]
• Belleflamme, P. and Peitz, M., The Economics of Platforms: Concepts and Strategy, Cambridge University Press, 2021. [https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108696913]
• Biglaiser, G., Calvano, E., and Crémer, J., “Incumbency advantage and its value.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 28(No. 1 2019): 41-48. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12307]
• Black, C. L., Jr., “He Cannot Choose but Hear: The Plight of the Captive Auditor.” Columbia Law Review 53(No. 7 1953): 960-972. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1119180]
• Boik, A., Greenstein, S., and Prince, J., The empirical economics of online attention, NBER Working Paper No. 22427, 2016. [https://doi.org/10.3386/w22427]
• Bundeskartellamt, Sektoruntersuchung Online-Werbung – Zusammenfassender Abschlussbericht. B6-25/18, 2023..
• CMA, Online platforms and digital advertising market study, interim report, 2019.
• Darvesh, N., Radhakrishnan, A., Lachance, C. C., Nincic, V., Sharpe, J. P., Ghassemi, M., Straus, S. E., and Tricco, A. C. “Exploring the prevalence of gaming disorder and Internet gaming disorder: A rapid scoping review.” Systematic Reviews 9(No. 68 2020). [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01329-2]
• Edelman, B., “The market design and policy of online review platforms.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33(No. 4 2017): 635-649. [https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx043]
• David, S. E., “Attention Platforms, the Value of Content, and Public Policy.” Review of Industrial Organization 54(No. 4 2019): 775-792. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-019-09681-x]
• Ezrachi, A., and Stucke, M. E., Virtual Competition: The Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy, Harvard University Press, 2016. [https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674973336]
• Franck, J., and Peitz, M., Market Definition and Market Power in the Platform Economy, CERRE report, May, 2019.
• Gordon, B. R., Jerath, K., Katona, Z., Narayanan, S., Shin, J., and Wilbur, K. C., “Inefficiencies in Digital Advertising Markets.” Journal of Marketing 85(No. 1 2020): 7-25. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920913236]
• Greenstein, S., Peitz, M., and Valletti, T., “Net Neutrality: A Fast Lane to Understanding the Trade-Offs.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(No. 2 2016): 127–150. [https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.2.127]
• Hagiu, A., and Wright, J., When data creates competitive advantage, Harvard Business Review, January-February 2020, 2020.
• Hagiu, A., and Wright, J., “Data-enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage.” The RAND Journal of Economics 54(No. 4 2023): 638-667. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12453]
• Hoong, R., “Self control and smartphone use: An experimental study of soft commitment devices.” European Economic Review 140(2021). [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103924]
• Hosseinmardi, H., Ghasemian, A., Clauset, A., Mobius, M., Rothschild, D. M., and Watts, D. J., “Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(No. 32 2021): 1-8. [https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101967118]
• Ichihashi, S., and Kim, B., “Addictive Platforms.” Management Science 69(No. 2 2023): 1127-1145. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4392]
• Irmen, A., and Thisse, J., “Competition in Multi-characteristics Spaces: Hotelling Was Almost Right.” Journal of Economic Theory 78(No. 1 1998): 76-102. [https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1997.2348]
• Jeon, D. S., and Nasr, N., “News Aggregators and Competition among Newspapers on the Internet.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 8(No. 4 2016): 91-114. [https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20140151]
• Kittaka, Y., Sato, S., and Zennyo, Y., “Self-preferencing by platforms: A literature review.” Japan and the World Economy 66(2023). [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2023.101191]
• Klemperer, P., “Competition when Consumers have Switching Costs: An Overview with Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics, and International Trade.” Review of Economic Studies 62(No. 4 1995): 515-539. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2298075]
• Malone, J. B., Nevo, A., Nolan, Z., and Williams, J. W. “Is OTT Video a Substitute for TV? Policy Insights from Cord-Cutting.” Review of Economics and Statistics 105(No. 6 2023): 1615-1623. [https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01132]
• Monti, G., Attention intermediaries: Regulatory options and their institutional implications, Unpublished manuscript, TILEC Discussion Paper DP2020-018, 2020. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3646264]
• Newman, J., Regulating Attention Markets, Unpublished manuscript, University of Miami Legal Studies Research Paper, 2020.
• Peitz, M., Economic Policy for Digital Attention Intermediaries, ZEW Discussion Paper 20-035, 2020. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3654009]
• Peitz, M., and Reisinger, M., “The Economics of Internet Media.” in Anderson, S., Stromberg, D., and Waldfogel, J. (eds.): Handbook of media economics. vol. 1A, North Holland, 2015: 445-530. [https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62721-6.00010-X]
• Peitz, M., and Valletti, T., “Reassessing competition concerns in electronic communications markets.” Telecommunications Policy 39(No. 10 2015): 896–912. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.012]
• Petry, N. M., Rehbein, F., Gentile, D. A., Lemmens, J. S., Rumpf, H., Mößle, T., Bischof, G., Tao, R., Fung, D. S. S., Borges, G., Auriacombe, M., Ibáñez, A. G., Tam, P., and O’Brien, C. P., “An international consensus for assessing Internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach.” Addiction 109(No. 9 2014): 1399-1406. [https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12457]
• Prat, A., and Valletti, T., “Attention Oligopoly.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 14(No. 3 2022): 530-557. [https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20200134]
• Shapiro, B. T., Hitsch, G. J., and Tuchman, A. E., “TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability: Generalizable Results from 288 Brands.” Econometrica 89(No. 4 2021): 1855-1879. [https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA17674]
• Simon, H. A., “Designing organizations for an information-rich world.” in Greenberger, M. (ed.): Computers, Communication, and the Public Interest. The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971: 37-72.
• Wu, T., “Blind Spot: The Attention Economy and the Law.” Antitrust Law Journal 82(No. 3 2019). Citations from the preprint available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2941094
• Zennyo, Y., “Freemium competition among ad-sponsored platforms.” Information Economics and Policy 50(2020). [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2019.100848]