Seoul Journal of Economics
[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 36, No. 1, pp.137-163
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 28 Feb 2023
Received 26 Oct 2022 Revised 13 Jan 2023 Accepted 18 Jan 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22904/sje.2023.36.1.005

Acquisitions by Business Group and Technology Transfer

Young Gak KIM ; Sadao NAGAOKA
Young Gak Kim, Professor, Senshu University, Japan ykim@isc.senshu-u.ac.jp
Sadao Nagaoka, Researcher, RIETI, Tokyo Keizai University, Japan snagaoka@tku.ac.jp

JEL Classification: O3, G34

Abstract

Two important opportunities for accelerating the growth of newly established firms are initial public offerings and acquisitions. This study focuses on the acquisition of a firm and its subsequent transformation into a subsidiary by business groups and investigates how such governance facilitates technology transactions (i.e., transfer of patent rights) and firm growth in Japan. The analysis reveals that such acquisitions can lead to increased technology transactions even when the transactions directly related to the acquisition are excluded and the transactions with firms outside the business group are included. However, the increase in technology transactions is limited mainly to wholly owned subsidiaries. The transfer of patent rights to a subsidiary is accompanied by an improvement in its sales, R&D, and productivity, controlling for the increase in its capital base. The sales and other performance of the business group also improve with the number of acquisitions.

Keywords:

Acquisitions, Patent transactions, Innovation

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as a part of the Project “Developing an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem” undertaken at the Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI). The first author acknowledges the financial support from JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP19H01486 and JP20H00071.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, C. Lelarge, J. Van Reenen, and F. Zilibotti, “Technology, information and the decentralization of the firm.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (No. 4 2007): 1759-1800. [https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1759]
  • Aghion, P., and Tirole, J., “The Management of Innovation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (No. 4 1994): 1185-1209. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2118360]
  • Arora A., and Gambardella, A., “The market for technology.” in HANDBOOK OF THE ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION 1 (2010): 641-678. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01015-4]
  • Caves, R. E., Crookell, H., Killing, J. P., “The imperfect market for technology licenses.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 45 (No. 3 1983): 223-248. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1983.mp45003002.x]
  • Gompers P. J. Lerner and D. Scharfstein, “Entrepreneurial spawning: public corporations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986 to 1999.” Journal of Finance 60 (No. 2 2005): 577-614. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00740.x]
  • Jensen, R., Thursby, M., “Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions.” American Economic Review 91 (No. 1 2001): 240-259. [https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.240]
  • Kaplan, S. N., and Schoar, A., “Private equity performance: returns, persistence and capital.” Journal of Finance 60 (No. 4 2005): 1791-1823. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00780.x]
  • Savva N., Taneri N., “The Role of Equity, Royalty, and Fixed Fees in Technology Licensing to University Spinoffs.” Management Science 61 (No. 6 2015): 1323-1343l. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2000]
  • Zeckhauser, R., “The challenge of contracting for technological information.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93(No. 23 1996): 12743-12748. [https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.23.12743]