Corporate Governance and Chaebol Reform in Korea
JEL Classification: D23, G39, K22, L29
Abstract
A typical chaebol consists of many diversified and legally independent affiliates, all of which are controlled by a controlling shareholder family. This paper characterizes the chaebol governance structure as controlling shareholder- managerialism to differentiate it from shareholder capitalism and stakeholderism. We examine the historical and institutional background that contributed to the persistence of the chaebol governance structure despite the gradual dilution of ownership. By regression analysis about the top 30 chaebols, we also find that the chaebols' pyramid control structure became to reveal its limitations around the early 1990s, ane thus chaebol governance should have been improved even before the financial crisis. But this finding could not justify the way in which the government has initiated the governance reform since the crisis. Since the major problem of chaebol governance largely came from the lack of market disciplining mechanisms, the government should put more efforts in providing the appropriate environments where market mechanisms operate effectively.
Keywords:
Corporate governance, Chaebol, Controlling shareholder, Pyramid controlAcknowledgments
The views expressed in this paper are the authors' and do not reflect KERI's position.
References
- Cho, D. Korean Chaebols. Seoul: Maeil Business, 1997 (in Korea).
- Choi, S. The Large Business Groups in Korea: 1999. Seoul: Center for Free Enterprise, 2000 (in Korea).
- Chung, Y., and Sohn Y. A Study on the Improvement of Institutions for Exercising Voting Rights. Seoul: Korea Securities Research Institute, 1998 (in Korean).
- Chung, Y., and Sohn Y. “Trend of Security-Related Institutions: 1999.” Korea Securities Research Institute, 1999 (in Korea).
- Demsetz, H., and Lehn, K. “The Sturucture of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences.” Journal of Political Economy 93 (No. 6 1985): 1155-77. [https://doi.org/10.1086/261354]
- Fair Trade Commission. “The Subsidiaries of Large Business Groups.” Public Report 04/01/2000, 2000 (in Korean).
- Ghemawat, P., and Khanna, T. “The Nature of Diversified Business Groups: A Research Design and Two Case Studies.” Journal of Industrial Economics 46 (No. 1 1998): 1211-30. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00060]
- Hwang, I. Market Structure and Social Efficiency. Seoul: Korea Economic Research Institute, 1998 (in Korea).
- Hwang, I. Chaebol's Diversification, Market Structure, and Aggregate Concentration. Seoul: Korea Economic Research Institute, 1999 (in Korea).
- Hwang, I. “Evaluation of Chaebol Governance Structure and Reform Policies.” Mimeograph, 2000a (in Korea).
- Hwang, I. “Diversification and Restructuring of the Korean Business Group.” Presented at the International Symposium for Transforming Korean Management and Business Environment, 2000b.
- Hwang, I., Lee, I., Lee, I. K., Seo, J., Lee, B., Chun, I., and Wee, J. “A Search for New Paradigm of Korean Corporate Governance.” KERI Policy Report No. 99-03. Seoul: Korea Economic Research Institute, 1999 (in Korea).
- Hwang, I., and Seo, J. “Chaebol Governance and Reform in Korea.” Presented at the 8th SJE International Symposium on Corporate Governance and Restructuring in East Asia, Seoul, Korea, August 25, 2000.
- Jensen, M., and Meckling, W. “The Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (No. 4 1976): 305-60. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X]
- Joh, S., and Ryoo, S. “Evaluation of Changes in the Corporate Governance System of Korean Chaebols.” Mimeograph, 2000.
- Kang, H. The Efficiency and the Transfer of Wealth in Court Receivership Procedure. Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul: Seoul National University, 2000 (in Korea).
- Kang, C., Choi, J., and Chang, J. Chaebol. Seoul: Beebong Publishing Co., 1991.
- Khanna, T., and Palepu, K. “Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets.” Harvard Business Review 75 (No. 4 July-August 1997): 41-51.
- Kim, J. Barriers to Entry in Korean Industries. Seoul: Korea Economic Research Institute, 1994 (in Korea).
- Kim, J. Chaebol Ownership Structure: Statistics, Concepts, and Analysis. Mimeograph, 1999.
- Kim, Y. “The Function and Power of Controlling Organization in Korean Chaebol.” In S. Lee, S. Jwa, K. Chung, and Y. Kim, Korean Corporate Governance: Present and Future. Seoul: Korean Institute for Management Development, 2000 (in Korea).
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. “Legal Determinants of External Finance.” Journal of Finance 52 (No. 5 1997): 1131-50. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02727.x]
- Lee, S., Jwa, S., Chung, K., and Kim, Y. Korean Corporate Governance: Present and Future. Seoul: Korean Institute of Management Development, 2000 (in Korea).
- Morck, R., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, B. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation.” Journal of Financial Economics 20 (1988): 293-316. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90048-7]
- Morck, R., Strangeland, D., and Yeung, B. “Inherited Wealth, Corporate Control and Economic Growth: The Canadian Disease?” NBER Working Paper Series No. 6814. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1998. [https://doi.org/10.3386/w6814]
- Nam, I., Kim, J., Kang, Y., Joh, S., and Kim, J. “Corporate Governance in Korea.” KDI Working Paper No. 9915. Seoul: Korea Development Institute, 1999.
- Riker, W. “Comments on Vincent Ostrom's Paper.” Public Choice 27 (No. 1 1976): 13-5. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718943]
- Seo, J. Corporate Bankruptcy Systems in Korea. Seoul: Korea Economic Research Institute, 2000 (in Korea).
- Shin, K. “The Ceilings on Equity Ownership.” Mimeograph, 2000.
- Society for Research of Corporate Structure. Large Corporations in Korea. Seoul: POSCO Research Institute, 1995 (in Korea).
- Zhuang, J., Edwards, D., Webb, D., and Capulong, M. Corporate Governance and Finance in East Asia. Asia Development Bank, 2000.