Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Seoul Journal of Economics
[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.173-203
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 31 May 2005
Received 17 Mar 2005 Revised 10 May 2005

Long-Run Comparative Advantage and Transitional Dynamics after Free Trade in an Endogenous Growth Model

Noh-Sun Kwark
Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Sogang University, 1 Shinsoo-dong, Mapo-gu, Seoul 121-742, Korea, Tel: +82-2-705-8770, Fax: +82-2-704-8599 kwark@sogang.ac.kr

JEL Classification: F43, F40, O10

Abstract

This paper examines the determinants of long-run comparative advantage and analyzes transitional dynamics after free trade in an endogenous growth model. It shows that a country with favorable conditions for capital accumulation has a long-run comparative advantage in capital-intensive goods. Transitional dynamics shows that the growth rate of a more patient country tends to be higher while a less patient country experiences a slowdown in its output growth rate during the transition path. In this study, it is shown that an endogenous growth model with international trade can produce the three empirically observed facts in the rapidly growing East Asian countries: high savings rates, high growth rates, and a significant change in the trade pattern.

Keywords:

Long-run comparative advantage, Endogenous growth, Transitional dynamics, Capital accumulation

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Marianne Baxter, Mark Bils, Yongsung Chang, Joao Gomez, Insoo Kang, Sergio Rebelo, Changyong Rhee, Alan Stockman, Farshid Vahid, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are of course mine.

References

  • Barro, Robert J., Mankiw, N. Gregory, and Sala-i-Martin, Xavier. “Capital Mobility in Neoclassical Models of Growth.” American Economic Review 83(March 1995): 103-15.
  • Baxter, Marianne. “Fiscal Policy, Specialization, and Trade in the Two-Sector Model: The Return of Ricardo?” Journal of Political Economy 100(August 1992): 713-44. [https://doi.org/10.1086/261837]
  • Clarida, Richard H., and Findlay, Ronald. Endogenous Comparative Advantage, Government, and the Patterns of Trade. NBER Working Paper, No. 3813, 1991. [https://doi.org/10.3386/w3813]
  • Easterly, William, and Rebelo, Sergio. “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth.” Journal of Monetary Economics 32 (No. 3 1993): 417-58. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90025-B]
  • Findlay, Ronald. “Factor Proportions and Comparative Advantage in the Long Run.” Journal of Political Economy 78(No. 1 1970): 27-34. [https://doi.org/10.1086/259598]
  • Fisher, Eric O’N. “Growth, Trade, and International Transfers.” Journal of International Economics 39 (Nos. 1-2 1995): 143-58. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(94)01358-Y]
  • Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
  • International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 1992, 1993.
  • Lucas, Robert E., Jr. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22(August 1988): 3-42. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7]
  • Lucas, Robert E., Jr. “Making a Miracle.” Econometrica 61(March 1993): 251-72. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2951551]
  • MacDonald, Glenn M., and Markusen, James R. “A Rehabilitation of Absolute Advantage.” Journal of Political Economy 93 (April 1985): 277-97. [https://doi.org/10.1086/261300]
  • Markusen, James R. “Factor Movements and Commodity Trade as Complements.” Journal of International Economics 14(1983): 341-56. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(83)90009-0]
  • Matsuyama, Kiminori. “Agricultural Productivity, Comparative Advantage, and Economic Growth.” Journal of Economic Theory 58(1992): 317-34. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(92)90057-O]
  • Mulligan, Casey B., and Sala-i-Martin, Xavier. A Note on the Time-Elimination Method for Solving Recursive Economic Models. NBER Technical Working Paper, No. 116, 1991. [https://doi.org/10.3386/t0116]
  • Mulligan, Casey B., and Sala-i-Martin, Xavier. “Transitional Dynamics in Two-Sector Models of Endogenous Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(August 1993): 739-73. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2118407]
  • Oniki, H., and Uzawa, H. “Patterns of Trade and Investment in a Dynamic Model of International Trade.” Review of Economic Studies 32 (No. 89 1965): 15-38. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2296328]
  • Pack, Howard, and Page, John M. Jr. Accumulation, Exports, and Growth in the High-Performing Asian Economies. Carnegie -Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, No. 40, pp. 199-236, 1994. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(94)90008-6]
  • Rebelo, Sergio. “Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 99(June 1991): 500-21. [https://doi.org/10.1086/261764]
  • Rybczynski, T. M. “Factor Endowment and Relative Commodity Prices.” Economica 22 (No. 88 1955): 336-41. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2551188]
  • Ventura, Jaume. “Growth and Interdependence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (February 1997): 57-84. [https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555127]
  • World Bank. World Development Report. Oxford University Press, 1982, 1992.
  • Young, Alwyn. “Lessons from the East Asian NICs: A Contrarian View.” European Economic Review 38 (April 1994): 964-73. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)90132-5]
  • Young, Alwyn. “The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(August 1995): 641-80. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2946695]