Contests with Linear Externality in Prizes
JEL Classification: D72
Abstract
This study examines contests in which prizes are affected linearly by aggregate effort. In particular, this research analyzes a contest among individuals as a benchmark to scrutinize the effects of prize externality and sharing-rule information on rent-dissipation rate and social welfare. Thereafter, the current study investigates two types of group contest with linear prize externality: one with private information on intra-group sharing rules and the other with public information on intra-group sharing rules. Results indicate as follows. (1) An increase in prize externality increases rent-dissipation rate but has no effect on social welfare. (2) The group contest with private information on sharing rules yields higher social welfare and lower rent-dissipation rate than the one with public information on sharing rules.
Keywords:
Group contest, Linear externality in prize, Intra-group sharing rule, Private information on sharing rules, Public information on sharing rulesAcknowledgments
We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments and suggestions. Any remaining errors are our own responsibility.
References
- Baik, K. H. and S. Lee. “Collective Rent Seeking with Endogenous Group Sizes.” European Journal of Political Economy 13 (No. 1 1997): 121-130. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(96)00041-9]
- Baik, K. H. and S. Lee. “Collective Rent Seeking When Sharing Rules Are Private Information.” European Journal of Political Economy 23 (No. 3 2007): 768-776. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.09.013]
- Chowdhury, S. and R. Sheremeta. “A Generalized Tullock Contest.” Public Choice 147 (No. 3-4 2011): 413-420. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9636-3]
- Chung, T. Y. “Rent-seeking Contest When the Prize Increases with Aggregate Efforts.” Public Choice 87 (No. 1-2 1996): 55-66. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00151729]
- Cohen, C., T. Kaplan, and A. Sela. “Optimal Rewards in Contests.” The RAND Journal of Economics 39 (No. 2 2008): 434-451. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00021.x]
- Dixit, A. “Strategic Behavior in Contests.” American Economic Review 77 (No. 5 1987): 891-898.
- Eggert, W. and M. Kolmar. “Contests with Size Effects.” European Journal of Political Economy 22 (No. 4 2006): 989-1008. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.06.005]
- Ellingsen, T. “Strategic Buyers and the Social Cost of Monopoly.” American Economic Review 81 (No. 3 1991): 648-657.
- Kolmar, M. and H. Rommeswinkel. “Contests with Group-specific Public Goods and Complementarities in Efforts.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 89 (May 2013): 9-22. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.02.006]
- Konrad, K. “Altruism and Envy in Contests: An Evolutionarily Stable Symbiosis.” Social Choice and Welfare 22 (No. 3 2004): 479-490. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-003-0229-7]
- Lee, S. and J. Kang. “Collective Contests with Externalities.” European Journal of Political Economy 14 (No. 4 1998): 727-738. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(98)00034-2]
- Lee, S. “Contests with Externalities.” Seoul Journal of Economics 13 (No. 2 2000): 123-134.
- Lee, S. “Contests with Size Effects through Costs.” European Journal of Political Economy 23 (No. 4 2007): 1190-1193. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.08.002]
- Shaffer, S. “War, Labor Tournaments, and Contest Payoffs.” Economics Letters 92 (No. 2 2006): 250-255. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.002]
- Topolyan, I. “Rent-seeking for a Public Good with Additive Contributions.” Social Choice and Welfare 42 (No. 2 2014): 465-476. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-013-0741-3]
- Tullock, G. “Efficient Rent Seeking.” In James M. Buchanan, Robert D. Tollison, and Gordon Tullock (eds.), Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. TX: Texas A&M University Press, 97-112, 1980.