Seoul Journal of Economics
[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 31, No. 1, pp.99-119
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 28 Feb 2018
Received 05 Jan 2018 Revised 04 Feb 2018 Accepted 05 Feb 2018

Optimal Contracts for Risk Managers

Jin Yong Jung
Jin Yong Jung, Visiting Researcher, BK21 Education Research Program, Seoul National University, South Korea econdragon@gmail.com

JEL Classification: D82, D86, G32, J33, J41

Abstract

This study analyzed the principal-agent problem, in which the agent performs risk management tasks, and considered the cost minimization problem of the principal, the objective of which is to design the cheapest contract inducing a target effort. Our results confirm that a one-step bonus contract should be used, which means that a bonus contract is most efficient for the principal in terms of incentive provision. A new condition to justify the first-order approach in our model was also provided.

Keywords:

Risk managers, Risk-reducing effort, Bonus contract

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the BK21Plus Program (Future-oriented innovative brain raising type, 21B20130000013) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE, Korea) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF).

References

  • Chava, S. and A. Purnanandam. “CEOs versus CFOs: Incentives and Corporate Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics 97 (No. 2 2010): 263-278. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.03.018]
  • Coles, J. L., N. D. Daniel, and L. Naveen. “Managerial Incentives and Risk-taking.” Journal of financial Economics 79 (No. 2 2006): 431-468. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.09.004]
  • Flaherty, J., G. Gourgey, and S. Natarajan. “Five Lessons Learned: Risk Management After the Crisis.” The European Financial Review Retrieved on 30 April 2013, Available at http://www.europeanfinancialreview.com/?p=894, .
  • Guay, W. R. “The Sensitivity of CEO Wealth to Equity Risk: An Analysis of the Magnitude and Determinants.” Journal of Financial Economics 53 (No. 1 1999): 43-71. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00016-1]
  • Hirshleifer, D. and Y. Suh. “Risk, Managerial Effort, and Project Choice.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 2 (No. 3 1992): 308-345. [https://doi.org/10.1016/1042-9573(92)90004-W]
  • Innes, Robert D. “Limited Liability and Incentive Contracting with Ex-ante Action Choices.” Journal of Economic Theory 52 (No. 1 1990): 45-67. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(90)90066-S]
  • Jewitt, I. “Justifying the First-order Approach to Principal-agent Problems.” Econometrica 56 (No. 5 1988): 1177-1190. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1911363]
  • Jung, J. Y., and S. K. Kim. “Information Space Conditions for the First-order Approach in Agency Problems.” Journal of Economic Theory 160 (2015): 243-279. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2015.09.003]
  • Kim, Son Ku. “Limited Liability and Bonus Contracts.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 6 (No. 4 1997): 899-913. [https://doi.org/10.1162/105864097567309]
  • Kim, Son Ku. “Optimal Reporting Frequency in Agencies.” Seoul Journal of Economics 18 (No. 1 2005): 21-44.
  • Kini, O. and R. Williams. “Tournament Incentives, Firm Risk, and Corporate Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 103 (No. 2 2012): 350-376. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.09.005]
  • Milgrom, Paul R. “Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications.” The Bell Journal of Economics 12 (No. 2 1981): 380-391. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3003562]
  • Palomino, Frédéric and Andrea Prat. “Risk Taking and Optimal Contracts for Money Managers.” RAND Journal of Economics 34 (No. 1 2003): 113-137. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3087446]
  • Rogerson, W. P. “The First-order Approach to Principal-agent Problems.” Econometrica 53 (No. 6 1985): 1357-1367. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1913212]
  • Smith, C. W. and R. M. Stulz, “The Determinants of Firms’ Hedging Policies.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 20 (No. 4 1985): 391-405. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2330757]
  • Sung, J. “Linearity with Project Selection and Controllable Diffusion Rate in Continuous-time Principal-agent Problems.” The RAND Journal of Economics 26 (No. 4 1995): 720-743. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2556015]