Effects of Education Policies and Institutions on Student Performance

Jieun Hong

Doctoral Student, Department of Economics, Seoul National University, Gwanak-ro1, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Korea gracias7@snu.ac.kr

JEL Classification: H75, I28, O15

Abstract

Using panel estimates from the Program for International Student Assessment dataset, this study examines how education policies work as the quality of institutions improves. The findings suggest that autonomy over budget-related decisions positively affects the overall performance of students as the quality of institutions improves, whereas autonomy over academic decisions has an ambiguous effect. Considering that country-level institutions interact with school autonomy, the performance of low-ranking students is improved by providing schools with enough power to decide on academic course content and textbooks. Meanwhile, providing schools with great autonomy over budget-related decisions benefits high-ranking students.

Keywords:

Education system, Education policy, School autonomy, Democracy, Governance effectiveness, Control of corruption

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the BK21Plus Program (Future-oriented innovative brain raising type, 21B20130000013) funded by the Ministry of Education(MOE, Korea) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF).

References

Bishop, J. H. “The Effect of National Standards and Curriculum-based Exams on Achievement.” The American Economic Review 87 (No. 2 1997): 260-264.
Bishop, J. H. and L. Wößmann. “Institutional Effects in a Simple Model of Educational Production.” Education Economics 12 (No. 1 2004): 17-38. [https://doi.org/10.1080/0964529042000193934]
Card, D., and Krueger, A. B. “School Resources and Student Outcomes: An Overview of the Literature and New Evidence from North and South Carolina.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (No. 4 1996): 31-50. [https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.10.4.31]
Card, D., and A. B. Krueger. “Does School Quality Matter? Returns to Education and the Characteristics of Public Schools in the United States.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (No. 1 1992): 1-40. [https://doi.org/10.1086/261805]
Clark, D. “The Performance and Competitive Effects of School Autonomy.” Journal of Political Economy 117 (No. 4 2009): 745-783. [https://doi.org/10.1086/605604]
Hahn, S., Kim, T. H., and Seo, B. “Effects of Public and Private Schools on Academic Achievement.” Seoul Journal of Economics 27 (No. 2 2014): 137-147.
Hanushek, E. “Teacher Characteristics and Gains in Student Achievement: Estimation Using Micro Data.” The American Economic Review 61 (No. 2 1971): 280-288.
Hanushek, E. A. “The Trade-off between Child Quantity and Quality.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (No. 1 1992): 84-117. [https://doi.org/10.1086/261808]
Hanushek, E. A. “The Failure of Input-based Schooling Policies.” The Economic Journal 113 (No. 485 2003): F64-F98. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00099]
Hanushek, E. A., and L. Woessmann. “The Role of Cognitive Skills in Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 46 (No. 3 2008): 607-668. [https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.3.607]
Hanushek, E. A., Susanne Link, and Ludger Woessmann. “Does School Autonomy Make Sense Everywhere? Panel Estimates from PISA.” Journal of Development Economics 104 (2013): 212-232. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.002]
Hoxby, C. M. “How Teachers' Unions Affect Education Production.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (No. 3 1996): 671-718. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2946669]
Hoxby, C. M. “The Effects of Class Size on Student Achievement: New Evidence from Population Variation.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (No. 4 2000): 1239-1285. [https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555060]
Johnson, G. E., and F. P. Stafford. “Social Returns to Quantity and Quality of Schooling.” Journal of Human Resources 8 (No. 2 1973): 139-155. [https://doi.org/10.2307/144731]
Morgan, J., and I. Sirageldin. “A Note on the Quality Dimension in Education.” The Journal of Political Economy 76 (No. 5 1968): 1069-1077. [https://doi.org/10.1086/259469]
Papke, L. E. “The Effects of Spending on Test Pass Rates: Evidence from Michigan.” Journal of Public Economics 89 (No. 5 2005): 821-839. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.008]
Richards, S. “The School Budget, Power and Responsibility in Grant-Maintained Schools.” Educational Management & Administration 20 (No. 4 1992): 249-257. [https://doi.org/10.1177/174114329202000407]
Rizzuto, R. and P. Wachtel. “Further Evidence on the Returns to School Quality.” Journal of Human Resources 15 (No. 2 1980): 240-254. [https://doi.org/10.2307/145333]
Romer, P. M. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (No. 5 1990): S71-S102. [https://doi.org/10.1086/261725]
Rouse, C. E. “Private School Vouchers and Student Achievement: An Evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (No. 2 1998): 553-602. [https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555685]
Sander, W. “Expenditures and Student Achievement in Illinois: New Evidence.” Journal of Public Economics 52 (No. 3 1993): 403-416. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)90043-S]
Wachtel, P. “The Effect on Earnings of School and College Investment Expenditures.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 58 (No. 3 1976): 326-331. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1924954]
Wößmann, L. “Schooling Resources, Educational Institutions and Student Performance: the International Evidence.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65 (No. 2 2003): 117-170. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00045]
Wößmann, L. “Educational Production in East Asia: The Impact of Family Background and Schooling Policies on Student Performance.” German Economic Review 6 (No. 3 2005): 331-353. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2005.00136.x]