Examining a Green Growth Model for Policy Implications
JEL Classification: O11, Q55, Q56
Abstract
Utilizing a simple growth model that includes the energy resource as an essential input, the possibility of a cleaner environment as well as larger income is demonstrated. Growth rates need not be lowered to have a cleaner environment, and the energy output ratio may be reduced. Pollution generated as side effects makes it necessary for policy makers to come up with suitable policies. In this regard, several policy options are proposed. Pollution tax (more generally, an environment tax) and a subsidy for energy and anti-pollution (environment) related technological progresses are such examples. A judicious mix of those policies can make income larger, energy usage smaller, and pollution level lower.
Keywords:
Growth, Energy uses, Environment, Green growth, Environment (energy or green) tax, Technological progressAcknowledgments
This research is supported by the National Research Council for Economics, Humanities, and Social Sciences. Professors Yong J. Kim, Jong S. Lim, and Sang I. Kang have provided the author with valuable comments. Valuable suggestions offered by two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.
References
- Aghion, Phillipe, and Howitt, Peter. “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction.” Econometrica 60 (No. 2 1992): 323-51. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599]
- Barro, Robert J., and Sala-i-Martin, Xavier. Economic Growth. 2nd Edition, Boston: MIT Press, 2004.
- Chung, Rae K., and Quah, Euston (eds). Pursuing Green Growth in Asia and Pacific. Singapore: CENGAGE Learning, 2010.
- Daly, Herman E., and Townsend, Kenneth N. Valuing the Earth: Economics, Ecology, Ethics. Boston: MIT Press, 1993.
- Ehrlich, Paul R., and Ehrlich, Anne H. The Dominant Animal: Human Evolution and the Environment. New York: Island Press, 2008.
- Ekins, Paul. Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability: The Prospects for Green Growth. London: Routledge, 2000.
- Ethier, Wilfred J. “National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade.” American Economic Review 72 (No. 3 1982): 389-405.
- Grossman, Gene M., and Krueger, Alan B. “Economic Growth and the Environment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (No. 2 1995): 353-77. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443]
- Iwami, Toru. “Economic Development and/or Environmental Quality: Emissions of CO2 and SO2 in East Asia.” Seoul Journal of Economics 17 (No. 1 2004): 55-84.
- Kim, Yong Jin, “Pollution Accumulation and Endogenous Growth in a Sustainable Equilibrium.” Korean Economic Review 12 (No. 2 1996): 2099-112.
- Lee, Jisoon. Green Growth: Korean Initiatives for Green Civilization. Seoul: Random House Korea, 2010.
- Lomborg, Bjorn. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
- Meadows, Donella, Randers, Jorgen, and Meadows, Dennis. Limits to Growth: The 30 Year Update. Boston: Chesea Green, 2004.
- Mincer, Jacob A. Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.
- Norton, Bryan G. Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. [https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226595221.001.0001]
- Romer, Paul M. “Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization.” American Economic Review 77 (No. 2 1987): 56-62.
- Romer, Paul M. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (No. 5 1990): S71-102. [https://doi.org/10.1086/261725]
- Stokey, Nancy M. “Are There Limits to Growth?” International Economic Review 39 (No. 1 1998): 1-31. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2527228]
- Taylor, M. Scott, and Brock, William A. “Economic Growth and the Environment: A Review of Theory and Empirics.” In S. Durlauf and P. Aghion (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth. New York: Elsevier, pp. 1749-821, 2005. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01028-2]