
Do Quotas Work? A Firm’s Perspective on Employing Individuals with Disabilities
JEL Classification: J14, J23, J78
Abstract
This study examines why firms do not hire people with disabilities despite the mandatory quota and associated levy for unfilled quota. Departing from the conventional regression discontinuity design, we estimate the Tobit and Heckman selection models to explain a firm’s quota compliance. The estimated parameters show firms above the size threshold are more likely to hire more individuals with disabilities. Considering the progressive levy rates for unfilled quota along with estimated marginal effects, we conclude that firms face sizable fixed costs associated with disability employment.
Keywords:
disability, disability employment quota, employment discrimination policy, selection modelAcknowledgments
We thank the conference participants of the Korean Association of Public Finance for their helpful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are our own. The authors contributed equally to this paper and share corresponding authorship.
References
- Amemiya, Takeshi. Advanced Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
-
Calonico, Sebastian, Matias D. Cattaneo, and Rocio Titiunik. “Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs.” Econometrica 82 (No. 62014): 2295-2326.
[https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11757]
-
Calonico, Sebastian, Matias D. Cattaneo, Max H. Farrell, and Rocio Titiunik. “rdrobust: Software for regression-discontinuity designs.” The Stata Journal 17(No. 2 2017): 372-404.
[https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1701700208]
-
Cameron, A. Colin, and Pravin K. Trivedi. Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811241]
-
Han, SeungHoon, Youngeun Baek, and Hosung Sohn. “The effects of mandatory quota policy on employment of disabled workers in Korea: a regression discontinuity design approach.” Journal of Asian Public Policy (2024): 1-21.
[https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2024.2415207]
- Heckman, James J. “The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models.” In Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5(No. 4 1976): 475-492. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
-
Heckman, James J. “Sample selection bias as a specification error.” Econometrica 47(No. 1 1979): 153-161.
[https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352]
-
Krekó, Judit, and Álmos Telegdy. “The effects of a disability employment quota when compliance is cheaper than defiance.” Economica 92(No. 366 2025): 614-643.
[https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12568]
-
Lalive, Rafael, Jean-Philippe Wuellrich, and Josef Zweimüller. “Do financial incentives affect firms’ demand for disabled workers?” Journal of the European Economic Association 11(No. 1 2013): 25-58.
[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01109.x]
-
Maddala, Gangadharrao S. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics(No. 3). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press, 1983.
[https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810176]
-
Nawata, Kazumitsu. “A note on the estimation of models with sample-selection biases.” Economics Letters 42(No.1 1993): 15-24.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(93)90167-B]
-
Nawata, Kazumitsu, and Nobuko Nagase. “Estimation of sample selection bias models.” Econometric Reviews 15(No.4 1996): 387-400.
[https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939608800363]
-
Wuellrich, Jean-Philippe. “The effects of increasing financial incentives for firms to promote employment of disabled workers.” Economics Letters 107(No. 2 2010): 173-176.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.01.016]