Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 20 , No. 1

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 59-91
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 28 Feb 2007
Received 03 Nov 2006 Revised 16 Dec 2006

A Parametric Test for the Distinction between Unemployed and Out of the Labor Force Statuses
Seung Chan Ahn ; Stuart Low
Associate Professor, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-3806, USA (miniahn@asu.edu)
Professor, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-3806, USA (Stuart.Low@asu.edu)

JEL Classification: C3, C5, J6


Whether or not to empirically consider two (employed versus not employed) or three (employed, unemployed, and out-of-labor-force) classifications in labor supply studies is a controversial issue. We develop a generalized censored probit likelihood function that nests both possibilities. A novelty of this likelihood function is that it allows researchers to test which representation of the labor market is appropriate as well as to estimate the degree to which classification errors may cloud inferences. Our empirical results demonstrate that classifying the three groups is useful to identify individuals’ labor force and employment decisions separately. However, failure to incorporate classification ambiguities may result in unemployed rates that are understated and out-of-labor-force rates that are overstated.

Keywords: Bivariate probit, Misclassification, Unemployment, Out of labor force


The authors gratefully acknowledge research support from Arizona State University's Business Dean's Council of 100. We also appreciate comments from Paul Burgess on an earlier draft of this paper. This paper was presented at the 14th Seoul Journal of Economics International Symposium on Sustainable Growth in East Asia, November 2006 and has benefited from suggestions made by two reviewers at that symposium.

1. Ahn, S. C. Three Essays on Share Contracts, Labor Supply, and the Estimation of Models for Dynamic Panel Data. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, 1990.
2. Blundell, R., Ham, J., and Meghir, C. “Unemployment and Female Labor Supply.” Economic Journal 97 (Supplment 1987): 44-64.
3. Blundell, R., Ham, J., and Meghir, C. “Unemployment, Discouraged Workers, and Female Labor Supply.” Research in Economics 52 (1998): 103-31.
4. Blundell, R., and Meghir, C. “Bivariate Alternatives to the Tobit Model.” Journal of Econometrics 34 (Nos. 1-2 1987): 179-200.
5. Bowlus, A. J. A Search Interpretation of Male-Female Wage Differentials. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Western Ontario, 1995.
6. Burdett, K., and Mortensen, D. “Search, Layoffs, and Labor Market Equilibrium.” Journal of Political Economy 88 (No. 4 1980): 652-72.
7. Burgess, P. “Compliance with Unemployment Insurance Job Search Requirements.” Journal of Law and Economics 35 (No. 2 1992): 371-96.
8. Caudill, S. B., and Mixon, F. G. Jr. “Analysing Misleading Discrete Responses: A Logit Model Based on Misclassified Data.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 67 (No. 1 2005): 105-13.
9. Clark, K. B., and Summers, L. H. The Dynamics of Youth Unemployment, in the Youth Labor Market Problems: Its Nature, Causes and Consequences. in R. Freeman and D. Wise (ed.), The University of Chicago Press, pp. 199-234, 1982.
10. Devine, T. J., and Kiefer, N. M. Empirical Labor Economics: The Search Approach. Oxford University Press, 1991.
11. Ehrenberg, R. G., and Smith, R. S. Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy. 3rd Edition, Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1987.
12. Farber, H. S. “Worker Preference for Union Representation.” Research in Labor Economics 2 (Supplment 1983): 171-205.
13. Filer, R. K., Hamermesh, D. S., and Rees, A. E. The Economics of Work and Pay. 6th Edition, New York: Harper Collins College Publishers, 1996.
14. Flaim, P. O., and Hogue, C. R. “Measuring Labor Force Flows: A Special Conference.” Monthly Labor Review 108 (July 1985): 7-17.
15. Flinn, C. J., and Heckman, J. “Are Unemployment and Out of the Labor Force Behaviorally Distinct Labor Force States?” Journal of Labor Economics 1 (No. 1 1982): 169-91.
16. Gönü l, F. “New Evidence on Whether Unemployment and Out of Labor Force Are Distinct States.” The Journal of Human Resources 27 (No. 2 1992): 329-61.
17. Hausman, J. A. “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica 46 (No. 6 1978): 1251-71.
18. Hausman, J. A. “The Effect of Wages, Taxes, and Fixed Costs on Women's Labor Force Participation.” Journal of Public Economics 14 (No. 2 1980): 161-94.
19. Hausman, J., Abrevaya, J., and Scoot-Morton, F. M. “Misclassification of the Dependent Variable in a Discrete-Response Setting.” Journal of Econometrics 87 (No. 2 1998): 239-269.
20. Heckman, J. “Shadow Prices, Market Wages, and Labor Supply.” Econometrica 42 (No. 4 1974): 670-94.
21. Lewbel, A. “Identification of the Binary Choice Model with Misclassification.” Econometric Theory 16 (No. 4 2000): 603-9.
22. Meng, C., and Schmidt, P. “On the Cost of Partial Observability in the Bivariate Probit Model.” International Economic Review 26 (No. 1 1985): 71-85.
23. Newey, W. K. “Generalized Method of Moments Specification Testing.” Journal of Econometrics 29 (No. 3 1985): 229-56.
24. Newey, W. K. “Specification Tests for Distributional Assumptions in the Tobit Model.” Journal of Econometrics 34 (Nos. 1-2 1987): 125-45.
25. Peters, S., and Smith, R. J. “Distributional Specification Tests against Semiparametric Alternatives.” Journal of Econometrics 47 (No. 1 1991): 175-94.
26. Poirier, D. J. “Partial Observability in Bivariate Probit Models.” Journal of Econometrics 12 (No. 2 1980): 209-17.
27. Sundt, L. The Role of Employment Opportunities in Determining Employment Status. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Arizona, 1990.