You are not permitted to access the full text of articles.
If you have any questions about permissions,
please contact the Society.
νμλμ λ Όλ¬Έ μ΄μ© κΆνμ΄ μμ΅λλ€.
κΆν κ΄λ ¨ λ¬Έμλ ννλ‘ λΆν λλ¦½λλ€.
|[ Article ]|
|Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 33, No. 2, pp.163-194|
|ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)|
|Print publication date 30 May 2020|
|Received 19 Jul 2018 Revised 24 Feb 2020 Accepted 02 Mar 2020|
|Theory and Empirics of the Institutional Evolution of Economic Development: An Application to Korean Economy|
|Sung-Hee Jwa, Ph.D. in Economics, Chairman, President Park Chung Hee Memorial Foundation, Former Visiting Professor of Seoul National University, and Former President of Korea Economic Research Institute. 386 World cup-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul 03906, South Korea, Tel: +82-2-716-9345 (email@example.com)|
Funding Information ▼
JEL Classification: B52, C51, E14, O10, O45, P10
This study empirically applies the theory of institutional requirement for economic development to explain Korea’s modern history of economic development. The study theoretically derives the argument that the economic discrimination (ED) policy regime “rewarding high performance relative to low performance” is the necessary condition for economic development, whereas the economic egalitarianism (EE) policy regime “disregarding the differences of performances” is the sufficient condition for economic stagnation. The paper then describes some details of the institutional evolution of Korean economy for the last 60 years and presents three testable hypotheses for Korea’s development history. 1) Institution-led growth hypothesis: The rise and fall of Korea’s economic growth was respectively led by the ED and EE policy regimes. 2) Corporate-led growth hypothesis: The rise and fall of Korea’s economic growth was led by the rise and fall of the corporate sector growth instigated by the ED and EE policy regimes, respectively; and 3) Political cycle of economic growth: The rise and fall of Korea’s economic growth was led by the political cycle of economization of politics and politicization of economy, respectively. These hypotheses are empirically verified by utilizing a new model of corporate production function. Policy implication is that Korea’s current economic difficulties can only be cured by reversing the current anti-corporate EE policy regime to the corporate-friendly ED policy regime.
|Keywords: Economic discrimination (ED), Economic egalitarianism (EE), ED policy regime, EE policy regime, Institution-led growth, Corporate-led growth, Corporate production function
The author appreciates two anonymous referees and especially the Editor, Prof. Lee Keun for their useful comments on the early draft. The author also thanks Dr. Taekyu Lee, an economist at the Korea Economic Research Institute for his assistance in empirical work, Dr. Tae-Joon Han, a senior fellow at the President Park Chung Hee Memorial Foundation for useful comments as well as assistance in English editing and Mr. Kyunghak Shim at the President Park Chung Hee Memorial Foundation for research assistance.
|1.||Coase, R. H. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4 (No. 16 1937): 386-405.
|2.||Jeong, Hyeok. “Analysis of Korea’s Long Term Growth Process and Lessons for Sustainable Development Policy.” The Korean Economic Review 34 (No. 2 2018): 237-266.|
|3.||Jwa, Sung-Hee. “A New Institutional Economics Perspective of Corporate Governance Reform in East Asia.” Seoul Journal of Economics 13 (No. 3 2000): 215-23.|
|4.||Jwa, Sung-Hee. A New Paradigm for Korea’s Economic Development: From Government Control to Market Economy. Springer (2001).
|5.||Jwa, Sung-Hee. The Evolution of Large Corporations in Korea: A New Institutional Economics Perspective of the Chaebol. Edward Elgar Publishing (2002).|
|6.||Jwa, Sung-Hee. “In Search of “Global Standards”: The Fallacy of Korea’s Corporate Policy.” Harvard Asia Quarterly 7 (No. 2 2003): 45-52.|
|7.||Jwa, Sung-Hee. New Wealth of Nation. Good Information press (2006). (in Korean)|
|8.||Jwa, Sung-Hee. A General Theory of Economic Development: Towards A Capitalist Manifesto. Edward Elgar Publishing (2017).|
|9.||Jwa, Sung-Hee. The Rise and Fall of Korea’s Economic Development; Lessons for the Developing and Developed Economies. Springer (2017a).|
|10.||Jwa, Sung-Hee. “Understanding Korea’s Saemaul Undong: Theory, Evidence, and Implication.” Seoul Journal of Economics 31 (No. 2 2018): 195-236.|
|11.||Jwa, Sung-Hee, and In Kwon Lee, eds. Competition and Corporate Governance in Korea: Reforming and Restructuring the Chaebol. Edward Elgar Publishing (2004).|
|12.||Jwa, Sung-Hee, and Sung-Kyu Lee. “Resurrecting the Industrial Policy as Development Policy based on Korean Experiences: Towards a Pro-market Industrial Policy.” World Economics 20 (No. 4 2019): 59-97.|
|13.||Micklethwait, John and Adrian Wooldridge. The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea. Random House Digital, Inc. (2003).|
|14.||Park, Chung Hee. Park Chung Hee Janggoon Damwhamunjlb (Speeches by the General Park Chung Hee). Dong-A publishing. (Nov. 1965). (in Korean)|
|15.||Park, Chung Hee. Saemaul: Korea’s New Community Movement. Korea Textbook Co., Ltd. (June 1979).|
|16.||Sakong, Il and Youngsun Koh (ed.). The Korean Economy: Six decades of Growth and Development. The committee for the 60-years history of Korean Economy, Korea development Institute (2010).|
|17.||World Bank. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. Oxford University Press (1993).|
Editorial Office, Seoul Journal of Economics, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University 599 Gwanangno, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-746, Korea
Tel: +82-2-880-5434 | Fax: +82-2-888-4454 | E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright (c) 2020 SJE. All rights reserved.