Editorial BoardXML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 21 , No. 2
[Paper List] [Go to Volume List]

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 285-310
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 31 May 2008
Received 21 Dec 2007 Revised 28 Jan 2008

Company Ownership and Performance during the Czech Transformation
Evzen Kocenda
Professor, CERGE-EI, Charles University and the Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic, The William Davidson Institute, Michigan, CEPR, London, and Euro Area Business Cycle Network. CERGE-EI, Politickych veznu 7, P.O. Box 882, 111 21 Prague, Czech Republic, Tel: +420-224-005-149, Fax: +420-224-227-143 (evzen.kocenda@cerge-ei.cz)

Funding Information ▼

JEL Classification: D24, C23, O47

Abstract

This paper focuses on ownership structure and firm performance following the privatization of state-owned firms in the Czech Republic in the 1990s. The ownership structures produced by Czech privatization are presented in detail, both during the privatization period (1990-1995) and after privatization (from 1996). This presentation goes beyond analyzing what firms were technically “private” to analyze the potential power of the state to control “private” firms. The main conclusion is that the state had a larger control potential than previously suggested. This forms a backdrop for a review of the literature on firm performance in the Czech Republic during and after privatization, exploring the impact of the division of large enterprises before privatization, the relative success of different kinds of owners after privatization, the performance of banks and the supposed benefits of Foreign Direct Investment. The Czech experience leads to the conclusion that there are many institutional factors that determine the success of privatization, and privatization programs currently being put into place in other countries should consider all these factors.

Keywords: Privatization, Corporate performance, Ownership structure, Economic transformation, Banking, Foreign direct investments
Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Hyunbae Chun, Jan Hanousek, Il-Dong Koh, Tigran Poghosyan, Juraj Stancik, Richard Stock, and participants at the Conference on Experience of Transition Economies and Implications for North Korea (Seoul, 2008) for helpful comments. Financial support from GACR grant No. 402/06/1293 is gratefully acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies.

References
1. Aggarwal, Raj., and Harper, Joel T. “Equity Valuation in the Czech Voucher Privatization Auctions.” Financial Management 29 (No. 4 2000): 77-100.
2. Bena, J., Hanousek, J. “Rent Extraction by Large Shareholders: Evidence Using Dividend Policy in the Czech Republic.” Czech Journal of Economics and Finance 58 (Nos. 3-4 2008): 106-30.
3. Bevan, Alan, Estrin, Saul, and Schaffer, Mark. Determinants of Enterprise Performance during Transition. Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation Working Paper 99/03, 1999.
4. Bishop, Matthew, and Kay, John. Does Privatisation Work? Lessons from the UK. London: Centre for Business Strategy, London Business School, 1988.
5. Bonin, John P., and Wachtel, Paul. “Financial Sector Development in Transition Economies: Lessons from the First Decade.” Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 12 (No. 1 2003): 1-66.
6. Bonin, J. P., Hasan, I., and Wachtel, P. “Bank Performance, Efficiency and Ownership in Transition Countries.” Journal of Banking and Finance 29 (No. 1 2005a): 31-53.
7. Bonin, J. P., Hasan, I., and Wachtel, P. “Privatization Matters: Bank Efficiency in Transition Countries.” Journal of Banking and Finance 29 (Nos. 8-9 2005b): 2155-78.
8. Bos, Dieter. Privatisation: A theoretical treatment. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1991.
9. Claessens, Stijn, and Djankov, Simeon. “Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance in the Czech Republic.” Journal of Comparative Economics 27 (No. 3 1999): 498-513.
10. Damijan, J. P., Knell, M., Majcen, B., and Rojec, M. “The Role of FDI, R&D Accumulation and Trade in Transferring Technology to Transition Countries: Evidence from Firm Panel Data for Eight Transition Countries.” Economic Systems 27 (No. 2 2003a): 189-204.
11. Damijan, J. P., Knell, M., Majcen, B., and Rojec, M. Technology Transfer through FDI in Top-10 Transition Countries: How Important are Direct Effects, Horizontal and Vertical Spillovers. WDI Working Paper No. 549, 2003b.
12. Djankov, S., and Hoekman, B. “Foreign Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises.” The World Bank Economic Review 14 (No. 1 2000): 49-64.
13. Djankov, Simeon, and Murrell, Peter. “Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 40 (No. 3 2002): 739-92.
14. EBRD. The Transition Report. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 1998.
15. Evenett, S., and Voicu, A. Picking Winners or Creating Them? Revising the Benefits of FDI in the Czech Republic. Oxford University Working Paper, 2003.
16. Fries, S., and Teci, A. “Cost Efficiency of Banks in Transition: Evidence from 289 Banks in 15 Post-communist Countries.” Journal of Banking and Finance 29 (No. 1 2005): 55-81.
17. Fries S., Neven, D., Seabright, P., and Taci, A. “Market Entry, Privatization and Bank Performance in Transition.” Economics of Transition 14 (No. 4 2006): 579-610.
18. Fungacova Z. Can the Market Fix a Wrong Administrative Decision? Massive Delisting on the Prague Stock Exchange. CERGE-EI Working Paper No. 335, 2007.
19. Fungacova Z., and Hanousek, J. A Castle Built on Sand: The Effects of Mass Privatization on Stock Market Creation in Transition Economies. BOFIT Discussion Paper No. 14, 2006.
20. Hanousek, J., and Kocenda, E. “The Impact of Czech Mass Privatization on Corporate Governance.” Journal of Economic Studies 30 (Nos. 3-4 2003): 278-93.
21. Hanousek, J., and Kocenda, E. Learning by Bidding: Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Experiment. CERGE-EI Working Paper No. 247, 2005.
22. Hanousek, J., and Kocenda, E. “Potential of the State to Control Privatized Firms.” Forthcoming in Economic Restructuring and Change, 2008.
23. Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E., and Lizal, L. “The Czech Republic: Understanding the Transition Reform.” In J. M. Fanelli and G. McMahon (eds.), Understanding Market Reforms, Volume 2: Motivation Implementation and Sustainability. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
24. Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E., and Ondko, P. “The Banking Sector in New EU Member Countries: A Sectoral Financial Flows Analysis.” Czech Journal of Economics and Finance 57 (Nos. 5-6 2007): 200-24.
25. Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E., and Svejnar, J. “Origin and Concentration: Corporate Ownership, Control and Performance in Firms after Privatization.” Economics of Transition 15 (No. 1 2007): 1-31.
26. Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E., and Svejnar, J. “Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS.” In G. Roland (ed.), Privatization: Success and Failures. New York, Columbia: Columbia University Press, Chapter 3, 2008.
27. Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E., and Svejnar, J. “Divestitures, Privatization and Corporate Performance in Emerging Markets.” Forthcoming in Economics of Transition, 2008b.
28. Hanousek, Jan, and Kroch, Eugene A. “The Two Waves of Voucher Privatization in the Czech Republic: A Model of Learning in Sequential Bidding.” Applied Economics 30 (1998): 133-43.
29. Harris, R., and Robinson, C. “Foreign Ownership and Productivity in the United Kingdom Estimates for U.K. Manufacturing Using the ARD.” Review of Industrial Organization 22 (No. 3 2003): 207-223.
30. Heckman, J. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47 (1979): 153-61.
31. Herfindahl, O. C. Concentration in the U.S. Steel Industry. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University, 1950.
32. Hirschmann, A. O. National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1945.
33. Hlavacek, M., and Gersl, A. “Foreign Direct Investment, Corporate Finance, and the Life Cycle of Investment.” Czech Journal of Economics and Finance 57 (Nos. 9-10 2007): 448-64.
34. Javorcik, B. S., and Arnold, J. Gifted Kids or Pushy Parents? Foreign Acquisitions and Plant Performance in Indonesia. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5065, 2005.
35. Kim, Byung-Yeon, Kim, Suk Jin, and Lee, Keun. “Assessing the Economic Performance of North Korea, 1954-1989: Estimates and Growth Accounting Analysis.” Journal of Comparative Economics 35 (No. 3 2007): 564-82.
36. Kocenda, E. “Residual State Property in the Czech Republic.” Eastern European Economics 37 (No. 5 1999): 6-35.
37. Kocenda, E. “Performance of Czech Coucher-privatized Firms.” Prague Economic Papers 12 (No. 2 2003): 122-31.
38. Kocenda, E., and Valachy, J. “Firm Ownership Structures: Dynamic Development.” Prague Economics Papers 11 (No. 3 2002): 255-68.
39. Kosova, R., and Ayyagari, M. Does FDI Facilitate Domestic Entrepreneurship? Evidence from the Czech Republic. School of Business. GWU Working Paper No. 8, 2006.
40. Kotrba J., Kocenda, E., and Hanousek, J. “The Governance of Privatization Funds in the Czech Republic.” In M. Simoneti, S. Estrin, and A. Boehm (eds.), The Governance of Privatization Funds: Experiences of the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovenia. London: Edward Elgar, pp. 7-43, 1999.
41. Kotrba, J., and Svejnar, J. “Rapid and Multifaceted Privatization: Experience of the Czech and Slovak Republics.” Nomisma/ Most 4 (1994): 147-85.
42. Lewandowski, J. “The Political Context of Mass Privatization in Poland.” In I. W. Liberman, S. Nestor, and R. Desai, (eds.), Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economics. Studies of Economies in Transformation. Vol. 23, Washington D.C.: The World Bank, pp. 35-39, 1997.
43. Lewandowski, J., and Szomburg, J. “Dekalog Prywatyzacji (Rules of Privatization).” Tygodnik Solidarnosc 45 (Supplement 1990).
44. Lizal, L., and Kocenda, E. “State of Corruption in Transition: The Case of the Czech Republic.” Emerging Markets Review 2 (No. 2 2001): 138-60.
45. Lizal, Lubomir, Singer, Miroslav, and Svejnar, Jan. “Enterprise Break-ups and Performance During the Transition from Plan to Market.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (No. 1 2001): 92-9.
46. Matousek, R., and Taci, A. “Efficiency in Banking: Empirical Evidence from the Czech Republic.” Economics of Planning 37 (Nos. 3-4 2005): 225-44.
47. Megginson, William L., and Netter, Jeffrey. “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization.” Journal of Economic Literature 39 (No. 2 2001): 321-89.
48. Poghosyan, Tigran, and Borovicka, Jaroslav. Banking Efficiency in Emerging Economics: The Impact of Ownership and Endogeneity and EU Accession. CERGE-EI Discussion Paper No. 2007-189, 2007.
49. Roland, Gerard. Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets and Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
50. Sabirianova, Klara, Svejnar, Jan, and Terrell, Katherine. Foreign Investment, Corporate Ownership, and Development: Are Firms in Emerging Markets Catching Up to the World Standard? William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 734, 2005.
51. Shirley, Mary, and Walsh, Patrick. Public versus Private Ownership: The Current State of the Debate. World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 2420, 2001.
52. Shleifer, Andrei, and Treisman, Daniel. “A Normal Country: Russia after Communism.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (No. 1 2005): 151-74.
53. Stancik, J. Horizontal and Vertical FDI Spillovers: Recent Evidence from the Czech Republic. CERGE-EI Working Paper No. 340, 2007.
54. Valbonesi, P. “Privatizing by Auction in the Eastern European Transition Countries: The Czechoslovak experience.” Nomisma/ Most 5 (1995): 101-31.
55. Vickers, John, and Yarrow, George. Privatization: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.
56. Vining, Aidan R., and Boardman, Anthony E. “Ownership versus Competition: Efficiency in Public Enterprise.” Public Choice 73 (No. 2 1992): 205-39.
 

Editorial Office, Seoul Journal of Economics, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University 599 Gwanangno, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-746, Korea
Tel: +82-2-880-5434 | Fax: +82-2-888-4454 | E-mail: sje@plaza.snu.ac.kr
Copyright (c) 2020 SJE. All rights reserved.