Editorial BoardXML

Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 16 , No. 2

[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 119-181
Abbreviation: SJE
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 31 May 2003
Received 29 Oct 2003 Revised 13 Jan 2004

Exchange Rate Regimes in East Asia After the Crisis: Implications from Intra-Daily Data
Shin-ichi Fukuda ; Sanae Ohno
Professor, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo, Hongo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 113, JAPAN, Fax: +81-3-5841-5521 (sfukuda@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp)
Associate Professor, Department of Commerce, Takachiho University

Funding Information ▼

JEL Classification: F31, F33, F36


Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate what affected the post-crisis exchange rates of five East Asian countries: Singapore, Thailand, Korea, Taiwan, and Malaysia. Based on intra-daily observations, we examine how and when these five East Asian currencies changed their correlations with the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen. During the time zones when East Asian markets were closed, the East Asian currencies kept strong correlations with the U.S. dollar throughout the pos-crisis period. We, however, find structural breaks in the correlations during the time zones when East Asian markets were open. In the post-crisis period, the first structural break arose when Malaysia adopted the fixed exchange rate. The second structural break occurred when Indonesia and Thailand introduced inflation targeting. The structural breaks suggest strong monetary and real linkage among East Asian countries. After early 2000, the East Asian currencies increased correlations with the U.S. dollar and began reverting back to de facto pegs against the U.S. dollar in terms of their growth rates.


Keywords: Exchange rates, East Asia, Intra-daily data

Acknowledgments

An early version of this paper was presented at the Eleventh Seoul Journal of Economics International Symposium. We would like to thank Eiji Ogawa. Yong-Sang Shyn, and conference participants for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. Fukudas research is supported by Japanese Government, Ministry of Education Aid for Science Research on Priority Area #12124203.


References
1. Benassy-Quere, A. “Optimal Pegs for Asian Currencies.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 13 (1999): 44-60.
2. Bayoumi, T., Eichengreen, B., and Mauro, P. “On Regional Monetary Arrangements for ASEAN.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 14 (2000): 121-48.
3. Bayoumi, T., Eichengreen, B., and Mauro, P. “The Suitability of ASEAN for a Regional Currency Arrangement.” The World Economy 24 (2001): 933-54.
4. Calvo, G., and Reinhart, C. “Fear of Floating.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (2002): 379-408.
5. Corsetti, G., Pesenti, P., and Roubini, N. “What Caused the Asian Currency and Financial Crisis?” Japan and the World Economy 11 (1999): 305-73.
6. Fischer, S. “Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (2001): 3-24.
7. Frankel, J. A. No Single Currency Regime is Right for All Countries or At All Times. NBER Working Paper No. w7338, 1999.
8. Frankel, J. A., and Wei, S. J. “Yen Bloc or Dollar Bloc: Exchange Rate Policies of the East Asian Economies.” In T. Ito and A. O. Krueger (eds.), Macroeconomic Linkage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
9. Fukuda, S. “The Structural Determinants of Invoice Currencies in Japan: The Case of Foreign Trades with East Asian Countries.” In T. Ito and A. O. Krueger (eds.), Financial Deregulation and Integration in East Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
10. Fukuda, S. Post-Crisis Exchange Rate Regimes in East Asia. CIRJE Discussion Paper 2002-CF-181, University of Tokyo, 2002.
11. Goldberg, L., and Klein, M. Foreign Direct Investment, Trade and Real Exchange Rate Linkages in Southeast Asia and Latin America. NBER Working Paper No. 6344, 1997.
12. Hernandez, L., and Montiel, P. Post-Crisis Exchange Rate Policy in Five Asian Countries: Filling in the “Hollow Middle”? IMF Working Paper 01/170, 2001.
13. Ito, T., Ogawa, E., and Sasaki, Y. N. “How Did the Dollar Peg Fail in Asia?” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 12 (1998): 256-304.
14. Kawai, M., and Akiyama, S. Implications of the Currency Crisis for Exchange Rate Arrangements in Emerging East Asia. Policy Research Working Paper No. 2502, World Bank, 2000.
15. McKinnon, R. I. “After the Crisis, the East Asian Dollar Standard Resurrected: An Interpretation of High-Frequency Exchange Rate Pegging.” In J. Stiglitz and Y. Shahid (eds.), Rethinking the East Asian Miracle. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 197-244, 2001.
16. McKinnon, R. I., and Schnabl, G. Synchronized Business Cycles in East Asia: Fluctuations in the Yen/Dollar Exchange Rate and China's Stabilizing Role. IMES Discussion Paper No. 2002- E-13, Bank of Japan, 2002.
17. Newey, W. K., and West, K. D. “A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix.” Econometrica 55 (1987): 703-08.
18. Ogawa, E. “Should East Asian Countries Return to Dollar Peg Again?” In P. Drysdale and K. Ishigaki (eds.), East Asian Trade and Financial Integration: New Issues. Asia Pacific Press, pp.159-84, 2001.
19. Rajan, R. S. “Exchange Rate Policy Options for Post-Crisis Southeast Asia: Is There a Case for Currency Baskets?” The World Economy 25 (2002): 137-63.
20. Takagi, S. “The Yen and Its East Asian Neighbors, 1980-95.” In T. Ito and A. O. Krueger (eds.), Changes in Exchange Rates in Rapidly Developing Countries: Theory, Practice, and Policy Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 185-207, 1999.
21. Williamson, J. “The Case for a Common Basket Peg for East Asian Currencies.” In S. Collignon, J. Pisani-Ferry, and Y. C. Park (eds.), Exchange Rate Policies in Emerging Asian Countries. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 327-43, 1999.
22. Williamson, J. Exchange Rate Regimes for Emerging Markets: Reviving the Intermediate Option. Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 2000.