Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Seoul Journal of Economics
[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 24, No. 3, pp.247-286
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Aug 2011
Received 19 Jan 2011 Revised 24 Feb 2011 Accepted 25 Feb 2011

　Toward Formal Representations of Search Processes and Routines in Organizational Problem Solving: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art

Giovanni Dosi ; Marco Faillo ; Luigi Marengo ; Daniele Moschella
Corresponding Author, Professor, LEM-Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Piazza Martiri della Liberta', 33-I-56127 Pisa, Italy, Tel: +39-050-883343, Fax: +39-050-883344 giovanni.dosi@sssup.it
Assistant Professor, University of Trento, Via Inama 5, 38122, Trento, Italy, Tel: +39-0461 28-2280 marco.faillo@unitn.it
Professor, LEM-Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Piazza Martiri della Liberta', 33-I-56127 Pisa, Italy, Tel: +39-050-883343 lugi.marengo@sssup.it
Ph. D. Student, LEM-Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Piazza Martiri della Liberta', 33-I-56127 Pisa, Italy, Tel: +39-050-883343 d.moschella@sssup.it

JEL Classification: D23, D83, L22

Abstract

This paper presents a critical overview of some recent attempts at building formal models of organizations as information-processing and problem-solving entities. We distinguish between two classes of models according to two distinct objects of analysis. The first class includes models mainly addressing information processing and learning; the second class includes models focusing upon the relationship between the division of cognitive labor and search process in some problem-solving space. The results begin to highlight important comparative properties regarding the impact on problem-solving efficiency and learning of different forms of hierarchical governance, the dangers of lock-in associated with specific forms of adaptive learning, the relative role of “online” vs. “offline” learning, the impact of the “cognitive maps” which organizations embody, the possible trade-offs between accuracy and speed of convergence associated with different “decomposition schemes,” the (ambiguous) role of organizational memory in changing environments.

Keywords:

Information processing, Problem-solving, Organizational learning, Routines

References

  • Aoki, M. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, 2001. [https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6867.001.0001]
  • Auerswald, P., Kauffman, S., Lobo, J., and Shell, K. “The Production Recipes Approach to Modelling Technological Innovation: an Application to Learning by Doing.” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 24 (No. 3 2000): 389-450. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(98)00091-8]
  • Baldwin, C. Y., and Clark, K. B. Design Rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. [https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001]
  • Becker, M. “Organizational Routines: a Review of the Literature.” Industrial and Corporate Change 13 (No. 4 2004): 643-78. [https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth026]
  • Chandler, A. The Visible Hand: the Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.
  • Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., and Winter, S. G. “Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues.” Industrial and Corporate Change 5 (No. 3 1996): 653-98. [https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/5.3.653]
  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (No. 1 1972): 1-25. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088]
  • Coriat, B., and Dosi, G. “Learning How to Govern and Learning How to Solve Problems: On the Co-Evolution of Competences, Conflicts and Organizational Routines.” In Chandler et al. (eds.), The Dynamic of the Firm. The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 103-134, 1998. [https://doi.org/10.1093/0198296045.003.0006]
  • Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1963.
  • Dosi, G. “Hierarchies, Markets and Power: Some Foundational Issues on the Nature of Contemporary Economic Organization.” Industrial and Corporate Change 4 (No. 1 1995): 1-19. [https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/4.1.1-a]
  • Dosi, G., Faillo, M., and Marengo, L. “Problem-Solving and Governance in the Capability-based View of the Firm: The Roles and Theoretical Representations of Organizational Routines.” In M. Becker (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Routines. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 107-124, 2008a.
  • Dosi, G., Faillo, M., and Marengo, L. “Organizational Capabilities, Patterns of Knowledge Accumulation and Governance Structure in Business Firms. An Introduction.” Organization Studies 29 (Nos. 8-9 2008b): 1165-85. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608094775]
  • Dosi, G., and Grazzi, M. “Technologies as Problem-Solving Procedures and Technologies as Input-Output Relations: Some Perspectives on the Theory of Production.” Industrial and Corporate Change 15 (No. 1 2006): 173-202. [https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtj010]
  • Dosi, G., Levinthal, D., and Marengo, L. The Uneasy Organizational Matching between Distribution of Knowledge, Division of Labor and Incentive Governance. LEM Working Papers, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, 2002.
  • Dosi, G., Levinthal, D., and Marengo, L. “Bridging Contested Terrain. Linking Incentive-based and Learning Perspectives on Organizational Evolution.” Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (No. 2 2003): 413-36. [https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.2.413]
  • Dosi, G., and Marengo, L. “Toward a Theory of Organizational Competencies.” In R. W. England (ed.), Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, pp. 157-178, 1995.
  • Dosi, G., and Marengo, L. “On the Tangled Discourse between Transaction Cost Economics and Competence-Based Views of the Firm.” In N. Foss and V. Mahnke (eds.), Competence, Governance and Entrepeneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 80-92, 2000.
  • Dosi, G., Marengo, L., Paraskevopoulou, E., and Valente, M. The Value and Dangers of Remembrance in Changing Worlds: a Model of Cognitive and Operational Memory of Organizations. In Progress, LEM, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, 2011.
  • Dosi, G., and Nelson, R. “Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes.” In B. Hall and N. Rosenberg (eds.), Handbook of Economics of Innovation. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 51-128, 2010. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01003-8]
  • Dosi, G., Nelson, R., and Winter, S. G. (eds.) The Nature and Dynamic of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. [https://doi.org/10.1093/0199248540.001.0001]
  • Ethiraj, S., and Levinthal, D. “Bounded Rationality and the Search for Organizational Architecture: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Design of Organizations and Their Evolvability.” Administrative Science Quarterly 49 (No. 3 2004a): 404-37.
  • Ethiraj, S., and Levinthal, D. “Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems.” Management Science 50 (No. 2 2004b): 159-73. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0145]
  • Gavetti, G. “Cognition and Hierarchy: Rethinking the Microfoundations of Capabilities’ Development.” Organization Science 16 (No. 6 2005): 599-617. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0140]
  • Gavetti, G., and Levinthal, D. “Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experimental Search.” Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (No. 1 2000): 113-37. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2666981]
  • Kauffman, S. A. The Origins of Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  • Knudsen, T., and Levinthal, D. A. “Two Faces of Search: Alternative Generation and Alternative Evaluation.” Organization Science 18 (No. 1 2007): 39-54. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0216]
  • Lazaric, N., and Denis, B. “Routinization and Memorization of Tasks inside a Workshop: An Illustration through a Case Study.” Industrial and Corporate Change 14 (No. 5 2005): 873-96.
  • Levinthal, D. “Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes.” Management Science 43 (No. 7 1997): 934-50. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934]
  • March, J. G., and Simon, H. A. Organizations. 2nd edn., New York: Wiley, 1993.
  • Marengo, L. “Coordination and Organizational Learning in the Firm.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2 (No. 4 1992): 313-26. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01200129]
  • Marengo, L. “Structure, Competence and Learning in an Adaptive Model of the Firm.” In G. Dosi and F. Malerba (eds.), Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Enterprise. London: MacMillan, 1996. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13389-5_6]
  • Marengo, L., Dosi, G., Legrenzi, P., and Pasquali, C. “The Structure of Problem-Solving Knowledge and the Structure of Organizations.” Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (No. 4 2000): 757-88. [https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.4.757]
  • Marengo, L., and Dosi, G. “Division of Labor, Organizational Coordination and Market Mechanisms in Collective Problem-solving.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 58 (No. 2 2005): 303-26. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.020]
  • Marengo, L., Pasquali, C., and Valente, M. “Decomposability and Modularity of Economic Interactions.” In W. Callebaut and D. Rasskin-Gutman (eds.), Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Complex Natural Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 835-897, 2005.
  • Mihm, J., Loch, C. H., Wilkinson, D., and Huberman, B. A. “Hierarchical Structure and Search in Complex Organizations.” Management Science 56 (No. 5 2010): 831-48. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1148]
  • Narduzzo, A., Rocco, E., and Warglien, M. “Talking about Routines in the Field.” In G. Dosi, R. Nelson and S. G. Winter (eds.), The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27-50, 2000. [https://doi.org/10.1093/0199248540.003.0002]
  • Nelson, R. “Why Do Firms Differ and How Does it Matter?” Strategic Management Journal 12 (No. 2 1991): 61-74. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121006]
  • Nelson, R. “Why Do Firms Differ and How Does It Matter? A Revisitation.” Seoul Journal of Economics 21 (No. 4 2008): 607-19.
  • Nelson, R., and Winter, S. G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.
  • Pavitt, K. “Innovating Routines in the Business Firm: What Corporate Task Should They Be Accomplishing?” Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (No. 1 2002): 117-33. [https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.1.117]
  • Pentland, B. T., and Reuter, H. H. “Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (No. 3 1994): 484-510. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2393300]
  • Rivkin, J. W., and Siggelkow, N. “Organizational Sticking Points on NK Landscapes.” Complexity 7 (No. 5 2002): 31-43. [https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.10037]
  • Rivkin, J. W., and Siggelkow, N. “Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies among Elements of Organizational Design.” Management Science 49 (No. 3 2003): 290-311. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.3.290.12740]
  • Rivkin, J. W., and Siggelkow, N. “Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implication for Exploration.” Management Science 53 (No. 7 2007): 1068-85. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0626]
  • Siggelkow, N., and Levinthal, D. A. “Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation.” Organization Science 14 (No. 6 2003): 650-69. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24840]
  • Siggelkow, N., and Levinthal, D. A. “Escaping Real (Non-Benign) Competency Traps: Linking the Dynamics of Organizational Structure to the Dynamics of Search.” Strategic Organization 3 (No. 1 2005): 85-115. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127005050521]
  • Siggelkow, N., and Rivkin, J. W. “Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity.” Organization Science 16 (No. 2 2005): 101-22. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0116]
  • Siggelkow, N., and Rivkin, J. W. “When Exploration Backfires: Unintended Consequences of Multilevel Organizational Search.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (No. 4 2006): 779-95. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083053]
  • Simon, H. A. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (No. 1 1955): 99-188. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852]
  • Simon, H. A. “The Architecture of Complexity.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106 (No. 6 1962): 467-82.
  • Simon, H. A. The Science of Artificial. 2nd Ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.
  • Smith, A. An Inquire into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Stahan and T. Cadell, 1776.
  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (No. 7 1997): 509-33; A Revised Version Is Published in G. Dosi, R. Nelson, and S. G. Winter (eds.), 2000. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z]
  • Walsh, J. P., and Ungson, G. R. “Organizational Memory.” The Academy of Management Review 16 (No. 1 1991): 57-91. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278992]
  • Winter, S. G., and Szulanski, G. “Replication as Strategy.” Organizational Science 12 (No. 6 1998): 730-43. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.6.730.10084]
  • Winter, S. G., and Szulanski, G. “Replication of Organizational Routines: Conceptualizing the Exploitation of Knowledge Assets.” In N. Bontis and C. W. Choo (eds.), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge: A Collection of Readings. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 207-222, 2002.
  • Zander, U., and Kogut, B. “Knowledge and the Speed of Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: an Empirical Test.” Organization Science 6 (No. 1 1995): 76-92. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.76]
  • Zollo, M., and Winter, S. G. “Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities.” Organization Science 13 (No. 3 2002): 339-51. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780]