Seoul Journal of Economics
[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.245-267
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Aug 2001
Received 09 Jun 2001 Revised 22 Oct 2001

Three Solutions to a Simple Commons Problem

Hervé Moulin
Professor, Department of Economics, Rice University, MS 22, P. O. Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251-1892, USA, Tel: +1-713-348-3532 moulin@rice.edu

JEL Classification : C71, D63, D78

Abstract

We compare the equity and incentive properties of three efficient solutions to a simple problem of cooperative production with binary demands for a homogeneous service, when marginal cost is either monotonically increasing or monotonically decreasing.

The solutions are the familiar competitive equilibrium with equal incomes, the Shapley value of the stand alone cooperative game, and the virtual price solution, applying the egalitarian equivalence idea to this particular model.

Keywords:

Cooperative production, No-envy, Shapley value, Tragedy of the commons

Acknowledgments

This paper prepared for the SJE-KISDI, International Symposium on Cost Allocation in Telecommunications, Seoul National University, June 9, 2001, Seoul, Korea. Also support from the NSF under grant SES 0096230 is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  • Cres, H., and Moulin, H. Commons with Increasing Marginal Costs: Random Priority versus Average Cost. Mimeograph, Rice University, 1999. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00102]
  • Dasgupta, P., and Heal, G. Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1979. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628375]
  • Demers, A, Keshav, S., and Shenker, S. “Analysis and Simulation of a Fair Queuing Algorithm.” International Research and Experience 1 (1990): 3-26.
  • Feller, W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Volume 1. New York: Wiley, 1971.
  • Hardin, G. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (1968): 1243-8. [https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243]
  • Moulin, H. Cooperative Microeconomics: A Game Theoretic Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400864140]
  • Moulin, H., and Shenker, S. “Serial Cost Sharing.” Econometrica 50 (1992): 1009-39. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2951537]
  • Moulin, H. “Strategyproof of Sharing of Submodular Costs: Budget Balance versus Efficiency.” Forthcoming in Economic Theory, 1999.
  • Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  • Shapley, L. S. “A Value for N-Person Games.” In H. W. Kuhn and W. Tucker (eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Game II, Annals of Mathematical Studies, 28. Pricenton, NJ: Priceton University Press, 1953. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400881970-018]
  • Shenker, S. “Making Greed Work in Networks: A Game Theoretic Analysis of Gateway Service Disciplines.” Mimeograph, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, 1990. [https://doi.org/10.1145/98457.98764]
  • Thomson, W., and Varian, H. “Theories of Justice Bases on Symmetry.” In Hurwicz et al. (eds.), Social Goals and Social Organization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  • Young, H. P. Equity: In Theory and Practice. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.