Seoul Journal of Economics
[ Article ]
Seoul Journal of Economics - Vol. 16, No. 1, pp.59-69
ISSN: 1225-0279 (Print)
Print publication date 28 Feb 2003
Received 09 Jun 2003 Revised 15 Dec 2003

Comparative Statics on the Left-Side Relatively Weak First-Degree Stochastic Dominance Order and Its Applications

Suyeol Ryu ; Iltae Kim
Research Fellow, Busan Development Institute, Busan, Republic of Korea, Tel: +82-51-640-2025 ryusuyeo@bdi.re.kr
Professor, Department of Economics and Management Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Republic of Korea, Tel: +82-62-530-1550 kit2603@chonnam.ac.kr

JEL Classification: D81

Abstract

This paper proposes a new concept of the left-side relatively weak first-degree stochastic dominance (L-RWFSD) order that extends the monotone likelihood ratio (MLR) order and the left-side monotone likelihood ratio (L-MLR) order. We show that this shift is a larger subset of FSD shifts than the MLR shift and the L-MLR shift that derive the same comparative statics results.

Keywords:

Left-side relatively weak first-degree stochastic dominance, Monotone likelihood ratio order, Left-side monotone likelihood ratio order

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank anonymous referees for insightful comments.

References

  • Dionne, G., Eeckhoudt, L., and Gollier, C. “Increases in Risk and Linear Payoffs.” International Economic Review 34 (No. 2 1993a): 309-19. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2526914]
  • Dionne, G., Eeckhoudt, L., and Gollier, C. “Relatively Weak Increases in Risk and Their Comparative Statics.” Economics Letters 41 (No. 3 1993b): 269-72. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(93)90152-3]
  • Eeckhoudt, L., and Gollier, C. “Demand for Risky Assets and the Monotone Probability Ratio Order.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 11 (No. 1 1995): 113-22. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067680]
  • Feder, G. “The Impact of Uncertainty in a Class of Objective Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 16 (No. 2 1977): 504-12. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(77)90025-4]
  • Fishburn, P. C., and Porter, B. “Optimal Portfolio with One Safe and One Risky Asset: Effects of Changes in Rate of Return and Risk.” Management Science 22 (1976): 1064-73. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.22.10.1064]
  • Katz, E. “A Note on a Comparative Statics Theorem for Choice under Risk.” Journal of Economic Theory 25 (No. 2 1981): 318-9. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(81)90011-9]
  • Kim, S. Changing Distributions in the Strong Sense and Their Comparative Statics: A Ratio Approach. Dissertation, Michigan State University, 1998.
  • Kraus, M. “A Comparative Statics Theorem for Choice under Risk.” Journal of Economic Theory 21 (No. 3 1979): 510-17. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(79)90056-5]
  • Landsberger, M., and Meilijson, I. “Demand for Risky Financial Assets: A Portfolio Analysis.” Journal of Economic Theory 50 (No. 1 1990): 204-13. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(90)90092-X]
  • Paroush, J., and Kahana, N. “Price Uncertainty and the Cooperative Firm.” American Economic Review 70 (No. 1 1980): 212-6.
  • Rothschild, M., and Stiglitz, J. “Increasing Risk: II. Its Economic Consequences.” Journal of Economic Theory 3 (No. 1 1971): 66-84. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(71)90034-2]
  • Sandmo, A. “On the Theory of the Competitive Firm under Price Uncertainty.” American Economic Review 61 (No. 1 1971): 65-73.
  • Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 2nd Ed. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1944.